Demographics details for Shrub oak, NY vs Jasper, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shrub oak, NY vs Jasper, AL.
Data | Shrub oak | Jasper |
---|---|---|
Population | 3,002 | 14,338 |
Median Age | 36.6 years | 35.4 years |
Median Income | $128,832 | $62,850 |
Married Families | 38.0% | 36.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Shrub oak vs Jasper
- The population in Jasper is higher at 14,338, compared to 3,002 in Shrub oak.
- Residents in Shrub oak have a higher median age of 36.6 years compared to 35.4 years in Jasper.
- Shrub oak has a higher median income of $128,832 compared to $62,850 in Jasper.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shrub oak at 38.0% compared to 36.0% in Jasper.
- The poverty level is higher in Jasper at 15%, compared to 5% in Shrub oak.
- Jasper has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.5% in Shrub oak.
Demographics
Demographics Shrub oak vs Jasper provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shrub oak | Jasper |
---|---|---|
Black | 2 | 10 |
White | 64 | 81 |
Asian | 15 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 4 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shrub oak vs Jasper
- In Jasper, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 10% compared to 2% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Jasper at 81% compared to 64% in Shrub oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Shrub oak at 15% compared to 0% in Jasper.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shrub oak at 18% compared to 5% in Jasper.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Jasper at 4%, compared to 1% in Shrub oak.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shrub oak and Jasper at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shrub oak | Jasper |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 13.2% | 19.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 8.2% | 13.2% |
Depression | 19.7% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 11.3% | 19.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.1% | 15.1% |
Obesity | 25.7% | 38.2% |
Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 19.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shrub oak vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.6% compared to 13.2% in Shrub oak.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Jasper at 24.0% versus 19.7% in Shrub oak.
- Jasper has a higher smoking rate at 19.8% compared to 11.3% in Shrub oak.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shrub oak at 18.1% compared to 15.1% in Jasper.
- Jasper has higher obesity rates at 38.2% compared to 25.7% in Shrub oak.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Jasper at 19.0% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shrub oak | Jasper |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.4% (13) | 0.5% (69) |
High School Diploma | 11.0% (330) | 14.6% (2,098) |
Less than High School | 12.9% (387) | 12.9% (1,856) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 38.9% (1,168) | 16.3% (2,338) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shrub oak vs Jasper
- In Jasper, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.4% in Shrub oak.
- In Jasper, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.6% compared to 11.0% in Shrub oak.
- Both cities report the same percentage of residents with less than a high school education at 12.9%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shrub oak hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 38.9% compared to 16.3% in Jasper.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.