Environment details: Shreveport LA
water quality is often poor from industrial waste.
Environment details: Erskine MN
Fairly good quality; local oversight noted.
Compare Environment: Shreveport LA vs Erskine MN
Environmental and Climate Insights
Understanding environmental and climate factors is crucial for assessing the sustainability and livability of a city or town. Key metrics such as CO2 emissions, water quality, and air quality indices provide valuable insights into the local environmental conditions. Evaluating these factors helps in making informed decisions about living and investing in a community.
| Metric | Shreveport | Erskine |
|---|---|---|
| CO2 Emissions | 1509 | 665 |
| Water Quality | 4/10 | 6/10 |
| Water Quality Explanation | water quality is often poor from industrial waste. | Fairly good quality; local oversight noted. |
| Median Air Quality | 1.0 | 2.0 |
| Average Air Quality Index | 1.59 | 1.56 |
| Worst AQI | 5.0 | 3.0 |
| Days with Poor AQI | 32 | 8 |
Environmental Insights Comparison: Shreveport vs Erskine
- The water quality in Erskine is superior at 6/10 compared to 4/10 in Shreveport.
- Erskine has a better median air quality index at 2.0 compared to 1.0 in Shreveport.
- The average air quality index is worse in Shreveport with 1.59 compared to 1.56 in Erskine.
- More days with poor air quality are reported in Shreveport at 32 compared to 8 in Erskine.
Overview of the Place
Gaining a comprehensive understanding of a place is crucial for making informed decisions about living or investing there. Factors such as local culture, economic conditions, and community dynamics play a significant role in shaping the overall experience. For a quick understanding of the data behind this place, we recommend checking out the page.