Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Oak harbor, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Oak harbor, WA.
| Data | Show low | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,056 | 24,403 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 31.7 years |
| Median Income | $57,406 | $68,039 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Oak harbor
- The population in Oak harbor is higher at 24,403, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 31.7 years in Oak harbor.
- Oak harbor has a higher median income of $68,039, compared to $57,406 in Show low.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 43.0% in Oak harbor.
- Show low has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 7% in Oak harbor.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Show low and Oak harbor at 4.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Oak harbor provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Show low | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 5 |
| White | 70 | 56 |
| Asian | 1 | 8 |
| Hispanic | 18 | 16 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 14 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Show low.
- Show low has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 56% in Oak harbor.
- In Oak harbor, the Asian population stands at 8%, greater than 1% in Show low.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Show low at 18% compared to 16% in Oak harbor.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Oak harbor at 14%, compared to 9% in Show low.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 1% in Oak harbor.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Show low | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 15.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 16.2% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 31.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.3% compared to 17.1% in Show low.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Oak harbor at 25.0% versus 20.7% in Show low.
- Oak harbor has a higher smoking rate at 15.1% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 16.2% in Oak harbor.
- Obesity rates are higher in Show low at 32.9% compared to 31.5% in Oak harbor.
- Disability percentages are higher in Show low at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Oak harbor.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Show low | Oak harbor |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 0.4% (106) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 12.8% (3,133) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 5.7% (1,395) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 17.6% (4,288) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Oak harbor
- In Oak harbor, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 12.8% in Oak harbor.
- More residents in Show low have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 5.7% in Oak harbor.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 17.6% in Oak harbor.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.