Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Moundville, AL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Moundville, AL.
Data | Show low | Moundville |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,056 | 3,271 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 37.1 years |
Median Income | $57,406 | $64,643 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 33.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 2.5 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Moundville
- In Show low, the population is higher at 12,056, compared to 3,271 in Moundville.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 37.1 years in Moundville.
- Moundville has a higher median income of $64,643, compared to $57,406 in Show low.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 33.0% in Moundville.
- The poverty level is higher in Moundville at 15%, compared to 10% in Show low.
- The unemployment rate in Show low is higher at 4.5%, compared to 2.5% in Moundville.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Moundville provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Show low | Moundville |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 50 |
White | 70 | 36 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Moundville
- In Moundville, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 50% compared to 0% in Show low.
- Show low has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to 36% in Moundville.
- The Asian population is larger in Show low at 1% compared to 0% in Moundville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Show low at 18% compared to 2% in Moundville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Moundville at 12%, compared to 9% in Show low.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 0% in Moundville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Show low | Moundville |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.6% |
Depression | 20.7% | 22.9% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 20.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 14.4% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 42.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Moundville
- In Moundville, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 17.1% in Show low.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Moundville at 22.9% versus 20.7% in Show low.
- Moundville has a higher smoking rate at 20.3% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 14.4% in Moundville.
- Moundville has higher obesity rates at 42.9% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- Disability percentages are higher in Show low at 17.0% compared to 13.0% in Moundville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Show low | Moundville |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 0.2% (6) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 21.3% (698) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 14.4% (470) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 10.4% (341) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Moundville
- In Moundville, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.2% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- In Moundville, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 21.3% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Moundville at 14.4%, compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 10.4% in Moundville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.