Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Greenup, IL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Greenup, IL.
| Data | Show low | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,056 | 1,352 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 35.7 years |
| Median Income | $57,406 | $53,583 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 47.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Greenup
- In Show low, the population is higher at 12,056, compared to 1,352 in Greenup.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 35.7 years in Greenup.
- Show low has a higher median income of $57,406 compared to $53,583 in Greenup.
- In Greenup, the percentage of married families is higher at 47.0%, compared to 44.0% in Show low.
- Show low has a higher poverty level at 10% compared to 9% in Greenup.
- The unemployment rate in Show low is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.9% in Greenup.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Greenup provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Show low | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 70 | 99 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | Data is updating |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Greenup
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Show low and Greenup at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Greenup at 99% compared to 70% in Show low.
- The Asian population is larger in Show low at 1% compared to 0% in Greenup.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Show low at 18% compared to 0% in Greenup.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Show low at 9% compared to 1% in Greenup.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 0% in Greenup.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Show low | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 17.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 23.5% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 19.2% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 21.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Greenup
- In Greenup, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.4% compared to 17.1% in Show low.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Greenup at 23.5% versus 20.7% in Show low.
- Greenup has a higher smoking rate at 19.2% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 17.7% in Greenup.
- Greenup has higher obesity rates at 37.1% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Greenup at 21.0% compared to 17.0% in Show low.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Show low | Greenup |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 29.0% (392) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 18.3% (248) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 11.0% (149) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Greenup
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Greenup.
- In Greenup, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 29.0% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Greenup at 18.3%, compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 11.0% in Greenup.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.