Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Farmersburg, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Farmersburg, IA.
Data | Show low | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,056 | 268 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 35.7 years |
Median Income | $57,406 | $46,641 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 56.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Farmersburg
- In Show low, the population is higher at 12,056, compared to 268 in Farmersburg.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 35.7 years in Farmersburg.
- Show low has a higher median income of $57,406 compared to $46,641 in Farmersburg.
- In Farmersburg, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 44.0% in Show low.
- The poverty level is identical in both Show low and Farmersburg at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Show low is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Farmersburg.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Farmersburg provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Show low | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 70 | 94 |
Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 18 | 2 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 4 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Farmersburg
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Show low and Farmersburg at 0%.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Farmersburg at 94% compared to 70% in Show low.
- The Asian population is larger in Show low at 1% compared to 0% in Farmersburg.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Show low at 18% compared to 2% in Farmersburg.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Show low at 9% compared to 4% in Farmersburg.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 0% in Farmersburg.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Show low | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 10.8% |
Depression | 20.7% | 19.3% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 20.2% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 21.7% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 40.5% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Farmersburg
- More residents in Show low report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 16.9% in Farmersburg.
- Depression is more prevalent in Show low at 20.7% compared to 19.3% in Farmersburg.
- Farmersburg has a higher smoking rate at 20.2% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Farmersburg at 21.7% compared to 17.9% in Show low.
- Farmersburg has higher obesity rates at 40.5% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- Disability percentages are higher in Show low at 17.0% compared to 11.0% in Farmersburg.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Show low | Farmersburg |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 0.7% (2) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 37.7% (101) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 20.9% (56) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 5.2% (14) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Farmersburg
- In Farmersburg, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- In Farmersburg, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 37.7% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Farmersburg at 20.9%, compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 5.2% in Farmersburg.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.