Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Coleman, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Coleman, OK.
| Data | Show low | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 12,056 | 297 |
| Median Age | 43.6 years | 39.7 years |
| Median Income | $57,406 | $45,938 |
| Married Families | 44.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Coleman
- In Show low, the population is higher at 12,056, compared to 297 in Coleman.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 39.7 years in Coleman.
- Show low has a higher median income of $57,406 compared to $45,938 in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 35.0% in Coleman.
- The poverty level is higher in Coleman at 12%, compared to 10% in Show low.
- The unemployment rate in Show low is higher at 4.5%, compared to 3.5% in Coleman.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Coleman provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Show low | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 2 |
| White | 70 | 77 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 18 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 11 |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Coleman
- In Coleman, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Show low.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Coleman at 77% compared to 70% in Show low.
- The Asian population is larger in Show low at 1% compared to 0% in Coleman.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Show low at 18% compared to 1% in Coleman.
- Both Show low and Coleman have the same percentage of residents identifying as two or more races at 9%.
- In Coleman, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 11%, compared to 2% in Show low.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Show low | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 13.9% |
| Depression | 20.7% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 14.6% | 22.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 32.9% | 40.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 29.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Coleman
- In Coleman, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.9% compared to 17.1% in Show low.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Coleman at 26.9% versus 20.7% in Show low.
- Coleman has a higher smoking rate at 22.9% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 14.8% in Coleman.
- Coleman has higher obesity rates at 40.8% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Coleman at 29.0% compared to 17.0% in Show low.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Show low | Coleman |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 28.6% (85) |
| Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 4.0% (12) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 11.1% (33) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Coleman
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low have no formal schooling at 0.1% compared to 0.0% in Coleman.
- In Coleman, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 28.6% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- More residents in Show low have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 4.0% in Coleman.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 11.1% in Coleman.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.