Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Chula vista, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Chula vista, CA.
Data | Show low | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,056 | 279,170 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 36.1 years |
Median Income | $57,406 | $101,984 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 39.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.8 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Chula vista
- The population in Chula vista is higher at 279,170, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 36.1 years in Chula vista.
- Chula vista has a higher median income of $101,984, compared to $57,406 in Show low.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 39.0% in Chula vista.
- The poverty level is higher in Chula vista at 12%, compared to 10% in Show low.
- Chula vista has a higher unemployment rate at 4.8% compared to 4.5% in Show low.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Chula vista provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Show low | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 70 | -4 |
Asian | 1 | 15 |
Hispanic | 18 | 60 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 23 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Chula vista
- In Chula vista, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Show low.
- Show low has a higher percentage of White residents at 70% compared to -4% in Chula vista.
- In Chula vista, the Asian population stands at 15%, greater than 1% in Show low.
- Chula vista has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 60%, compared to 18% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chula vista at 23%, compared to 9% in Show low.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 1% in Chula vista.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Show low | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.1% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 11.1% |
Depression | 20.7% | 15.8% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 10.5% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 17.4% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 24.9% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Chula vista
- More residents in Show low report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.1% in Chula vista.
- Depression is more prevalent in Show low at 20.7% compared to 15.8% in Chula vista.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Show low at 14.6% compared to 10.5% in Chula vista.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 17.4% in Chula vista.
- Obesity rates are higher in Show low at 32.9% compared to 24.9% in Chula vista.
- Disability percentages are higher in Show low at 17.0% compared to 9.0% in Chula vista.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Show low | Chula vista |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 1.7% (4,667) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 11.7% (32,545) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 18.1% (50,584) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 20.4% (56,958) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Chula vista
- In Chula vista, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.7% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a high school diploma at 14.3% compared to 11.7% in Chula vista.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chula vista at 18.1%, compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- In Chula vista, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 20.4% compared to 19.1% in Show low.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.