Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Cedar rapids, IA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Cedar rapids, IA.
Data | Show low | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,056 | 136,429 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 37.0 years |
Median Income | $57,406 | $66,895 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.3 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Cedar rapids
- The population in Cedar rapids is higher at 136,429, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 37.0 years in Cedar rapids.
- Cedar rapids has a higher median income of $66,895, compared to $57,406 in Show low.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 37.0% in Cedar rapids.
- The poverty level is identical in both Show low and Cedar rapids at 10%.
- The unemployment rate in Show low is higher at 4.5%, compared to 4.3% in Cedar rapids.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Cedar rapids provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Show low | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 9 |
White | 70 | 78 |
Asian | 1 | 3 |
Hispanic | 18 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 6 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Cedar rapids
- In Cedar rapids, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 9% compared to 0% in Show low.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Cedar rapids at 78% compared to 70% in Show low.
- In Cedar rapids, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 1% in Show low.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Show low at 18% compared to 4% in Cedar rapids.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Show low at 9% compared to 6% in Cedar rapids.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 0% in Cedar rapids.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Show low | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 15.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 9.6% |
Depression | 20.7% | 21.3% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 16.9% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 22.1% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 39.4% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Cedar rapids
- More residents in Show low report poor mental health at 17.1% compared to 15.5% in Cedar rapids.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Cedar rapids at 21.3% versus 20.7% in Show low.
- Cedar rapids has a higher smoking rate at 16.9% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Cedar rapids at 22.1% compared to 17.9% in Show low.
- Cedar rapids has higher obesity rates at 39.4% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- Disability percentages are higher in Show low at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Cedar rapids.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Show low | Cedar rapids |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 0.6% (803) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 14.9% (20,356) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 6.9% (9,473) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 22.3% (30,460) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Cedar rapids
- In Cedar rapids, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- In Cedar rapids, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.9% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- More residents in Show low have less than a high school education at 7.0% compared to 6.9% in Cedar rapids.
- In Cedar rapids, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.3% compared to 19.1% in Show low.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.