Demographics details for Show low, AZ vs Anderson, IN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Show low, AZ vs Anderson, IN.
Data | Show low | Anderson |
---|---|---|
Population | 12,056 | 55,099 |
Median Age | 43.6 years | 38.8 years |
Median Income | $57,406 | $44,974 |
Married Families | 44.0% | 31.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.9 |
Population Comparison: Show low vs Anderson
- The population in Anderson is higher at 55,099, compared to 12,056 in Show low.
- Residents in Show low have a higher median age of 43.6 years compared to 38.8 years in Anderson.
- Show low has a higher median income of $57,406 compared to $44,974 in Anderson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Show low at 44.0% compared to 31.0% in Anderson.
- The poverty level is higher in Anderson at 12%, compared to 10% in Show low.
- Anderson has a higher unemployment rate at 4.9% compared to 4.5% in Show low.
Demographics
Demographics Show low vs Anderson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Show low | Anderson |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 15 |
White | 70 | 72 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 18 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 9 | 5 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Show low vs Anderson
- In Anderson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 15% compared to 0% in Show low.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Anderson at 72% compared to 70% in Show low.
- Both Show low and Anderson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Show low at 18% compared to 7% in Anderson.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Show low at 9% compared to 5% in Anderson.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Show low at 2% compared to 0% in Anderson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Show low | Anderson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 17.1% | 19.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.4% | 14.7% |
Depression | 20.7% | 27.1% |
Smoking | 14.6% | 25.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.9% | 15.0% |
Obesity | 32.9% | 46.2% |
Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 22.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Show low vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.5% compared to 17.1% in Show low.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Anderson at 27.1% versus 20.7% in Show low.
- Anderson has a higher smoking rate at 25.1% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- Binge drinking is more common in Show low at 17.9% compared to 15.0% in Anderson.
- Anderson has higher obesity rates at 46.2% compared to 32.9% in Show low.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Anderson at 22.0% compared to 17.0% in Show low.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Show low | Anderson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.1% (12) | 0.8% (436) |
High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,726) | 22.3% (12,278) |
Less than High School | 7.0% (844) | 15.8% (8,680) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 19.1% (2,306) | 11.1% (6,109) |
Education Levels Comparison: Show low vs Anderson
- In Anderson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- In Anderson, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.3% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Anderson at 15.8%, compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Show low hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 11.1% in Anderson.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.