Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs Stuttgart, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs Stuttgart, AR.
| Data | Shirley | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,498 | 7,907 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 37.8 years |
| Median Income | $109,821 | $59,124 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 18% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Shirley vs Stuttgart
- In Shirley, the population is higher at 26,498, compared to 7,907 in Stuttgart.
- Residents in Shirley have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 37.8 years in Stuttgart.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821 compared to $59,124 in Stuttgart.
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
- The poverty level is higher in Stuttgart at 18%, compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Shirley and Stuttgart at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Shirley vs Stuttgart provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shirley | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 42 |
| White | 56 | 53 |
| Asian | 5 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 23 | 2 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 42% compared to 8% in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 53% in Stuttgart.
- The Asian population is larger in Shirley at 5% compared to 0% in Stuttgart.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shirley at 23% compared to 2% in Stuttgart.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shirley at 8% compared to 3% in Stuttgart.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shirley and Stuttgart at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shirley | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 19.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 14.6% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 23.1% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 13.6% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 20.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs Stuttgart
- In Stuttgart, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.8% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Stuttgart at 24.4% versus 21.1% in Shirley.
- Stuttgart has a higher smoking rate at 23.1% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shirley at 16.0% compared to 13.6% in Stuttgart.
- Stuttgart has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Stuttgart at 20.0% compared to 10.0% in Shirley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shirley | Stuttgart |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (555) | 0.8% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (5,874) | 25.5% (2,015) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (3,542) | 14.5% (1,144) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,547) | 12.0% (948) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs Stuttgart
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.8% in Stuttgart.
- In Stuttgart, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.5% compared to 22.2% in Shirley.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Stuttgart at 14.5%, compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 12.0% in Stuttgart.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.