Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs Springbrook, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs Springbrook, WI.
Data | Shirley | Springbrook |
---|---|---|
Population | 26,498 | 74 |
Median Age | 40.4 years | 42.3 years |
Median Income | $109,821 | $41,875 |
Married Families | 37.0% | 19.0% |
Poverty Level | 6% | 5% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.0 |
Population Comparison: Shirley vs Springbrook
- In Shirley, the population is higher at 26,498, compared to 74 in Springbrook.
- The median age in Springbrook is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 40.4 years in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821 compared to $41,875 in Springbrook.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shirley at 37.0% compared to 19.0% in Springbrook.
- Shirley has a higher poverty level at 6% compared to 5% in Springbrook.
- The unemployment rate in Shirley is higher at 4.2%, compared to 4.0% in Springbrook.
Demographics
Demographics Shirley vs Springbrook provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shirley | Springbrook |
---|---|---|
Black | 8 | Data is updating |
White | 56 | 81 |
Asian | 5 | 3 |
Hispanic | 23 | 4 |
Two or More Races | 8 | 12 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs Springbrook
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shirley at 8% compared to 0% in Springbrook.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Springbrook at 81% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- The Asian population is larger in Shirley at 5% compared to 3% in Springbrook.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shirley at 23% compared to 4% in Springbrook.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Springbrook at 12%, compared to 8% in Shirley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shirley and Springbrook at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shirley | Springbrook |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 14.5% |
Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 10.0% |
Depression | 21.1% | 23.1% |
Smoking | 17.0% | 15.5% |
Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 23.4% |
Obesity | 32.0% | 32.2% |
Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs Springbrook
- More residents in Shirley report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 14.5% in Springbrook.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Springbrook at 23.1% versus 21.1% in Shirley.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shirley at 17.0% compared to 15.5% in Springbrook.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Springbrook at 23.4% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Springbrook has higher obesity rates at 32.2% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Springbrook at 15.0% compared to 10.0% in Shirley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shirley | Springbrook |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (555) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 22.2% (5,874) | 23.0% (17) |
Less than High School | 13.4% (3,542) | 5.4% (4) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,547) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs Springbrook
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Springbrook.
- In Springbrook, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.0% compared to 22.2% in Shirley.
- More residents in Shirley have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 5.4% in Springbrook.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Springbrook.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.