Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs South san francisco, CA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs South san francisco, CA.

Data Shirley South san francisco
Population 26,498 63,484
Median Age 40.4 years 42.3 years
Median Income $109,821 $127,062
Married Families 37.0% 44.0%
Poverty Level 6% 8%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 3.6

Population Comparison: Shirley vs South san francisco

  • The population in South san francisco is higher at 63,484, compared to 26,498 in Shirley.
  • The median age in South san francisco is higher at 42.3 years, compared to 40.4 years in Shirley.
  • South san francisco has a higher median income of $127,062, compared to $109,821 in Shirley.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
  • The poverty level is higher in South san francisco at 8%, compared to 6% in Shirley.
  • The unemployment rate in Shirley is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.6% in South san francisco.

Demographics

Demographics Shirley vs South san francisco provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shirley South san francisco
Black 8 2
White 56 11
Asian 5 45
Hispanic 23 30
Two or More Races 8 11
American Indian Data is updating 1

Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs South san francisco

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shirley at 8% compared to 2% in South san francisco.
  • Shirley has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 11% in South san francisco.
  • In South san francisco, the Asian population stands at 45%, greater than 5% in Shirley.
  • South san francisco has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 30%, compared to 23% in Shirley.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in South san francisco at 11%, compared to 8% in Shirley.
  • In South san francisco, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Shirley.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shirley South san francisco
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% 12.9%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% 8.8%
Depression 21.1% 13.7%
Smoking 17.0% 9.3%
Binge Drinking 16.0% 14.5%
Obesity 32.0% 21.9%
Disability Percentage 10.0% 10.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs South san francisco

  • More residents in Shirley report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 12.9% in South san francisco.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shirley at 21.1% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shirley at 17.0% compared to 9.3% in South san francisco.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shirley at 16.0% compared to 14.5% in South san francisco.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shirley at 32.0% compared to 21.9% in South san francisco.
  • Disability percentages are the same in both Shirley and South san francisco at 10.0%.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shirley South san francisco
No Schooling 2.1% (555) 2.5% (1,583)
High School Diploma 22.2% (5,874) 13.7% (8,667)
Less than High School 13.4% (3,542) 14.8% (9,368)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (3,547) 30.4% (19,273)

Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs South san francisco

  • In South san francisco, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.5% compared to 2.1% in Shirley.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 13.7% in South san francisco.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in South san francisco at 14.8%, compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
  • In South san francisco, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 30.4% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.