Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs Little falls, MN
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs Little falls, MN.
| Data | Shirley | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,498 | 9,094 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 40.8 years |
| Median Income | $109,821 | $44,455 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 34.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Shirley vs Little falls
- In Shirley, the population is higher at 26,498, compared to 9,094 in Little falls.
- The median age in Little falls is higher at 40.8 years, compared to 40.4 years in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821 compared to $44,455 in Little falls.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shirley at 37.0% compared to 34.0% in Little falls.
- The poverty level is higher in Little falls at 11%, compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Shirley and Little falls at 4.2%.
Demographics
Demographics Shirley vs Little falls provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shirley | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | Data is updating |
| White | 56 | 95 |
| Asian | 5 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shirley at 8% compared to 0% in Little falls.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Little falls at 95% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- The Asian population is larger in Shirley at 5% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shirley at 23% compared to 1% in Little falls.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shirley at 8% compared to 3% in Little falls.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shirley and Little falls at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shirley | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.6% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 10.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 25.0% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 20.6% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 38.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs Little falls
- In Little falls, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.6% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Little falls at 25.0% versus 21.1% in Shirley.
- Little falls has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Little falls at 20.6% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Little falls has higher obesity rates at 38.5% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Little falls at 17.0% compared to 10.0% in Shirley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shirley | Little falls |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (555) | 0.7% (63) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (5,874) | 25.4% (2,308) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (3,542) | 11.7% (1,063) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,547) | 14.3% (1,301) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs Little falls
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.7% in Little falls.
- In Little falls, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.4% compared to 22.2% in Shirley.
- More residents in Shirley have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 11.7% in Little falls.
- In Little falls, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.3% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.