Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs Kingsland, GA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs Kingsland, GA.
| Data | Shirley | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,498 | 19,896 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 33.1 years |
| Median Income | $109,821 | $73,839 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shirley vs Kingsland
- In Shirley, the population is higher at 26,498, compared to 19,896 in Kingsland.
- Residents in Shirley have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 33.1 years in Kingsland.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821 compared to $73,839 in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shirley at 37.0% compared to 36.0% in Kingsland.
- The poverty level is higher in Kingsland at 9%, compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate in Shirley is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.5% in Kingsland.
Demographics
Demographics Shirley vs Kingsland provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shirley | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 21 |
| White | 56 | 60 |
| Asian | 5 | 2 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 21% compared to 8% in Shirley.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Kingsland at 60% compared to 56% in Shirley.
- The Asian population is larger in Shirley at 5% compared to 2% in Kingsland.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shirley at 23% compared to 8% in Kingsland.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Kingsland at 9%, compared to 8% in Shirley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shirley and Kingsland at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shirley | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 16.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.9% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 21.8% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 16.1% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 36.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs Kingsland
- In Kingsland, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.3% in Shirley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Kingsland at 21.8% versus 21.1% in Shirley.
- Kingsland has a higher smoking rate at 17.3% compared to 17.0% in Shirley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Kingsland at 16.1% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Kingsland has higher obesity rates at 36.1% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shirley at 10.0% compared to 9.0% in Kingsland.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shirley | Kingsland |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (555) | 0.3% (51) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (5,874) | 15.6% (3,105) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (3,542) | 5.9% (1,175) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,547) | 13.1% (2,616) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs Kingsland
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.3% in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 15.6% in Kingsland.
- More residents in Shirley have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 5.9% in Kingsland.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 13.1% in Kingsland.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.