Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs Irving, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs Irving, TX.
| Data | Shirley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 26,498 | 254,715 |
| Median Age | 40.4 years | 32.4 years |
| Median Income | $109,821 | $76,686 |
| Married Families | 37.0% | 39.0% |
| Poverty Level | 6% | 12% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.2 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Shirley vs Irving
- The population in Irving is higher at 254,715, compared to 26,498 in Shirley.
- Residents in Shirley have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 32.4 years in Irving.
- Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821 compared to $76,686 in Irving.
- In Irving, the percentage of married families is higher at 39.0%, compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
- The poverty level is higher in Irving at 12%, compared to 6% in Shirley.
- The unemployment rate in Shirley is higher at 4.2%, compared to 3.9% in Irving.
Demographics
Demographics Shirley vs Irving provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shirley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 8 | 13 |
| White | 56 | 11 |
| Asian | 5 | 22 |
| Hispanic | 23 | 43 |
| Two or More Races | 8 | 11 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs Irving
- In Irving, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 8% in Shirley.
- Shirley has a higher percentage of White residents at 56% compared to 11% in Irving.
- In Irving, the Asian population stands at 22%, greater than 5% in Shirley.
- Irving has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 43%, compared to 23% in Shirley.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Irving at 11%, compared to 8% in Shirley.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shirley and Irving at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shirley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.3% | 15.9% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 10.7% | 11.6% |
| Depression | 21.1% | 21.0% |
| Smoking | 17.0% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 17.4% |
| Obesity | 32.0% | 32.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 10.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs Irving
- More residents in Shirley report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 15.9% in Irving.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shirley at 21.1% compared to 21.0% in Irving.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shirley at 17.0% compared to 15.4% in Irving.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Irving at 17.4% compared to 16.0% in Shirley.
- Irving has higher obesity rates at 32.4% compared to 32.0% in Shirley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shirley at 10.0% compared to 7.0% in Irving.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shirley | Irving |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (555) | 1.8% (4,699) |
| High School Diploma | 22.2% (5,874) | 10.3% (26,322) |
| Less than High School | 13.4% (3,542) | 24.8% (63,108) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 13.4% (3,547) | 26.1% (66,363) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs Irving
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.8% in Irving.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 10.3% in Irving.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Irving at 24.8%, compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
- In Irving, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 26.1% compared to 13.4% in Shirley.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.