Demographics details for Shirley, NY vs Chestnut mound, TN

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shirley, NY vs Chestnut mound, TN.

Data Shirley Chestnut mound
Population 26,498 215
Median Age 40.4 years 36.0 years
Median Income $109,821 $50,000
Married Families 37.0% 51.0%
Poverty Level 6% 15%
Unemployment Rate 4.2 5.6

Population Comparison: Shirley vs Chestnut mound

  • In Shirley, the population is higher at 26,498, compared to 215 in Chestnut mound.
  • Residents in Shirley have a higher median age of 40.4 years compared to 36.0 years in Chestnut mound.
  • Shirley has a higher median income of $109,821 compared to $50,000 in Chestnut mound.
  • In Chestnut mound, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 37.0% in Shirley.
  • The poverty level is higher in Chestnut mound at 15%, compared to 6% in Shirley.
  • Chestnut mound has a higher unemployment rate at 5.6% compared to 4.2% in Shirley.

Demographics

Demographics Shirley vs Chestnut mound provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shirley Chestnut mound
Black 8 Data is updating
White 56 100
Asian 5 Data is updating
Hispanic 23 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shirley vs Chestnut mound

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shirley at 8% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Chestnut mound at 100% compared to 56% in Shirley.
  • The Asian population is larger in Shirley at 5% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Shirley at 23% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Shirley at 8% compared to 0% in Chestnut mound.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shirley and Chestnut mound at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shirley Chestnut mound
Mental Health Not Good 16.3% Data is updating%
Physical Health Not Good 10.7% Data is updating%
Depression 21.1% Data is updating%
Smoking 17.0% Data is updating%
Binge Drinking 16.0% Data is updating%
Obesity 32.0% Data is updating%
Disability Percentage 10.0% Data is updating%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shirley vs Chestnut mound

  • More residents in Shirley report poor mental health at 16.3% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shirley at 21.1% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shirley at 17.0% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shirley at 16.0% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shirley at 32.0% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Shirley at 10.0% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shirley Chestnut mound
No Schooling 2.1% (555) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 22.2% (5,874) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Less than High School 13.4% (3,542) 0.0% (Data is updating)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 13.4% (3,547) 0.0% (Data is updating)

Education Levels Comparison: Shirley vs Chestnut mound

  • A higher percentage of residents in Shirley have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a high school diploma at 22.2% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • More residents in Shirley have less than a high school education at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shirley hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 13.4% compared to 0.0% in Chestnut mound.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.