Demographics details for Sherwood, OH vs Gooding, ID
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, OH vs Gooding, ID.
| Data | Sherwood | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,408 | 15,715 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 38.3 years |
| Median Income | $140,788 | $60,938 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 8% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 2.9 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Gooding
- The population in Gooding is higher at 15,715, compared to 3,408 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Sherwood have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 38.3 years in Gooding.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $140,788 compared to $60,938 in Gooding.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Gooding.
- The poverty level is higher in Gooding at 8%, compared to 5% in Sherwood.
- The unemployment rate in Sherwood is higher at 3.2%, compared to 2.9% in Gooding.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Gooding provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sherwood | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 60 |
| Asian | 4 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 2 | 29 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 9 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Gooding
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sherwood and Gooding at 0%.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 60% in Gooding.
- The Asian population is larger in Sherwood at 4% compared to 0% in Gooding.
- Gooding has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 29%, compared to 2% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gooding at 9%, compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- In Gooding, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Sherwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sherwood | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 12.8% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 22.7% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 18.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.8% | 15.6% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 36.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Gooding
- In Gooding, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.4% compared to 14.3% in Sherwood.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Gooding at 22.7% versus 21.8% in Sherwood.
- Gooding has a higher smoking rate at 18.0% compared to 12.7% in Sherwood.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sherwood at 22.8% compared to 15.6% in Gooding.
- Gooding has higher obesity rates at 36.9% compared to 29.9% in Sherwood.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Gooding at 15.0% compared to 7.0% in Sherwood.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sherwood | Gooding |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.8% (131) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (412) | 19.5% (3,066) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (52) | 26.7% (4,203) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.3% (1,408) | 10.1% (1,588) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Gooding
- In Gooding, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Sherwood.
- In Gooding, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.5% compared to 12.1% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Gooding at 26.7%, compared to 1.5% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.3% compared to 10.1% in Gooding.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.