Demographics details for Sherwood, OH vs Chalfont, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, OH vs Chalfont, PA.
| Data | Sherwood | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 3,408 | 4,283 |
| Median Age | 47.1 years | 41.7 years |
| Median Income | $140,788 | $118,871 |
| Married Families | 45.0% | 40.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 2% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.4 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Chalfont
- The population in Chalfont is higher at 4,283, compared to 3,408 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Sherwood have a higher median age of 47.1 years compared to 41.7 years in Chalfont.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $140,788 compared to $118,871 in Chalfont.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 45.0% compared to 40.0% in Chalfont.
- Sherwood has a higher poverty level at 5% compared to 2% in Chalfont.
- Chalfont has a higher unemployment rate at 3.4% compared to 3.2% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Chalfont provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sherwood | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 91 | 88 |
| Asian | 4 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 2 | 4 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 4 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Chalfont
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sherwood and Chalfont at 0%.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 91% compared to 88% in Chalfont.
- Both Sherwood and Chalfont have the same percentage of Asian residents at 4%.
- Chalfont has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 4%, compared to 2% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Chalfont at 4%, compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sherwood and Chalfont at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sherwood | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 14.3% | 13.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 8.4% | 7.8% |
| Depression | 21.8% | 22.1% |
| Smoking | 12.7% | 12.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.8% | 20.5% |
| Obesity | 29.9% | 29.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 7.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Chalfont
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 14.3% compared to 13.8% in Chalfont.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Chalfont at 22.1% versus 21.8% in Sherwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 12.7% compared to 12.6% in Chalfont.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sherwood at 22.8% compared to 20.5% in Chalfont.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 29.9% compared to 29.5% in Chalfont.
- Disability percentages are the same in both Sherwood and Chalfont at 7.0%.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sherwood | Chalfont |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 12.1% (412) | 11.2% (479) |
| Less than High School | 1.5% (52) | 2.3% (98) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 41.3% (1,408) | 42.7% (1,830) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Chalfont
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Sherwood and Chalfont at 0.0%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a high school diploma at 12.1% compared to 11.2% in Chalfont.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Chalfont at 2.3%, compared to 1.5% in Sherwood.
- In Chalfont, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 42.7% compared to 41.3% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.