Demographics details for Sherwood, MI vs Maple valley, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, MI vs Maple valley, WA.
Data | Sherwood | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Population | 286 | 28,220 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 36.4 years |
Median Income | $53,092 | $137,595 |
Married Families | 61.0% | 47.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | Data is updating |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Maple valley
- The population in Maple valley is higher at 28,220, compared to 286 in Sherwood.
- The median age in Maple valley is higher at 36.4 years, compared to 34.3 years in Sherwood.
- Maple valley has a higher median income of $137,595, compared to $53,092 in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 61.0% compared to 47.0% in Maple valley.
- Sherwood has a higher poverty level at 8% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
- Maple valley has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 4.5% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Maple valley provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sherwood | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 2 |
White | 92 | 74 |
Asian | Data is updating | 11 |
Hispanic | 1 | 5 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Maple valley
- In Maple valley, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 2% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 74% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 0% in Sherwood.
- Maple valley has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 5%, compared to 1% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Maple valley at 8%, compared to 6% in Sherwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sherwood at 1% compared to 0% in Maple valley.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sherwood | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 15.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 8.6% |
Depression | 25.7% | 25.8% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 9.4% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 19.6% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 24.3% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 7.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Maple valley
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 15.9% in Maple valley.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Maple valley at 25.8% versus 25.7% in Sherwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 21.8% compared to 9.4% in Maple valley.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Maple valley at 19.6% compared to 18.4% in Sherwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 39.5% compared to 24.3% in Maple valley.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sherwood at 26.0% compared to 7.0% in Maple valley.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sherwood | Maple valley |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (6) | 0.4% (103) |
High School Diploma | 39.2% (112) | 10.2% (2,878) |
Less than High School | 45.1% (129) | 3.1% (879) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.4% (7) | 28.5% (8,032) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Maple valley
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.4% in Maple valley.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 10.2% in Maple valley.
- More residents in Sherwood have less than a high school education at 45.1% compared to 3.1% in Maple valley.
- In Maple valley, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.5% compared to 2.4% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.