Demographics details for Sherwood, MI vs Columbus, OH
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, MI vs Columbus, OH.
| Data | Sherwood | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 286 | 907,971 |
| Median Age | 34.3 years | 32.7 years |
| Median Income | $53,092 | $62,994 |
| Married Families | 61.0% | 29.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 14% |
| Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Columbus
- The population in Columbus is higher at 907,971, compared to 286 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Sherwood have a higher median age of 34.3 years compared to 32.7 years in Columbus.
- Columbus has a higher median income of $62,994, compared to $53,092 in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 61.0% compared to 29.0% in Columbus.
- The poverty level is higher in Columbus at 14%, compared to 8% in Sherwood.
- Columbus has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 4.5% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Columbus provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sherwood | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 29 |
| White | 92 | 51 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 6 |
| Hispanic | 1 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 6 | 7 |
| American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Columbus
- In Columbus, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 0% in Sherwood.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 51% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, the Asian population stands at 6%, greater than 0% in Sherwood.
- Columbus has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 1% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Columbus at 7%, compared to 6% in Sherwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sherwood at 1% compared to 0% in Columbus.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sherwood | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 18.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 12.2% |
| Depression | 25.7% | 23.9% |
| Smoking | 21.8% | 19.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.7% |
| Obesity | 39.5% | 38.0% |
| Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Columbus
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 18.4% in Columbus.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sherwood at 25.7% compared to 23.9% in Columbus.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 21.8% compared to 19.6% in Columbus.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sherwood at 18.4% compared to 17.7% in Columbus.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 39.5% compared to 38.0% in Columbus.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sherwood at 26.0% compared to 11.0% in Columbus.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sherwood | Columbus |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.1% (6) | 1.4% (12,592) |
| High School Diploma | 39.2% (112) | 14.4% (130,716) |
| Less than High School | 45.1% (129) | 9.7% (87,770) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.4% (7) | 25.2% (229,071) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Columbus
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 1.4% in Columbus.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 14.4% in Columbus.
- More residents in Sherwood have less than a high school education at 45.1% compared to 9.7% in Columbus.
- In Columbus, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 25.2% compared to 2.4% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.