Demographics details for Sherwood, MI vs College place, WA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, MI vs College place, WA.
Data | Sherwood | College place |
---|---|---|
Population | 286 | 9,804 |
Median Age | 34.3 years | 32.2 years |
Median Income | $53,092 | $60,417 |
Married Families | 61.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 4.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs College place
- The population in College place is higher at 9,804, compared to 286 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Sherwood have a higher median age of 34.3 years compared to 32.2 years in College place.
- College place has a higher median income of $60,417, compared to $53,092 in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 61.0% compared to 37.0% in College place.
- The poverty level is higher in College place at 10%, compared to 8% in Sherwood.
- College place has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 4.5% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs College place provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sherwood | College place |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
White | 92 | 72 |
Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
Hispanic | 1 | 18 |
Two or More Races | 6 | 8 |
American Indian | 1 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs College place
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Sherwood and College place at 0%.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 92% compared to 72% in College place.
- In College place, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Sherwood.
- College place has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 1% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in College place at 8%, compared to 6% in Sherwood.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Sherwood at 1% compared to 0% in College place.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sherwood | College place |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 18.7% | 16.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 12.2% | 10.9% |
Depression | 25.7% | 26.6% |
Smoking | 21.8% | 12.8% |
Binge Drinking | 18.4% | 17.6% |
Obesity | 39.5% | 32.7% |
Disability Percentage | 26.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs College place
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 18.7% compared to 16.9% in College place.
- Higher depression rates are seen in College place at 26.6% versus 25.7% in Sherwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 21.8% compared to 12.8% in College place.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sherwood at 18.4% compared to 17.6% in College place.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 39.5% compared to 32.7% in College place.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sherwood at 26.0% compared to 14.0% in College place.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sherwood | College place |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 2.1% (6) | 0.1% (14) |
High School Diploma | 39.2% (112) | 8.6% (847) |
Less than High School | 45.1% (129) | 13.2% (1,295) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 2.4% (7) | 22.7% (2,224) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs College place
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood have no formal schooling at 2.1% compared to 0.1% in College place.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a high school diploma at 39.2% compared to 8.6% in College place.
- More residents in Sherwood have less than a high school education at 45.1% compared to 13.2% in College place.
- In College place, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.7% compared to 2.4% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.