Demographics details for Sherwood, AR vs Whitehall, WI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, AR vs Whitehall, WI.
| Data | Sherwood | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,082 | 1,632 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 36.8 years |
| Median Income | $74,917 | $56,894 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 30.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.6 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Whitehall
- In Sherwood, the population is higher at 33,082, compared to 1,632 in Whitehall.
- Residents in Sherwood have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 36.8 years in Whitehall.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $74,917 compared to $56,894 in Whitehall.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 40.0% compared to 30.0% in Whitehall.
- Sherwood has a higher poverty level at 9% compared to 7% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher unemployment rate at 3.6% compared to 3.3% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Whitehall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sherwood | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 1 |
| White | 64 | 83 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 3 | 12 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 3 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sherwood at 28% compared to 1% in Whitehall.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Whitehall at 83% compared to 64% in Sherwood.
- The Asian population is larger in Sherwood at 1% compared to 0% in Whitehall.
- Whitehall has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 12%, compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sherwood at 4% compared to 3% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sherwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sherwood | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 15.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 10.3% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 24.0% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 16.7% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 24.4% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 34.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Whitehall
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 15.2% in Whitehall.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Whitehall at 24.0% versus 23.9% in Sherwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 18.0% compared to 16.7% in Whitehall.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Whitehall at 24.4% compared to 14.6% in Sherwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 35.7% compared to 34.9% in Whitehall.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sherwood at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in Whitehall.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sherwood | Whitehall |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (212) | 0.4% (7) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (4,592) | 24.4% (398) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (2,280) | 15.7% (256) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (7,568) | 8.6% (141) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Whitehall
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.4% in Whitehall.
- In Whitehall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 24.4% compared to 13.9% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Whitehall at 15.7%, compared to 6.9% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 8.6% in Whitehall.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.