Demographics details for Sherwood, AR vs Waipahu, HI
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, AR vs Waipahu, HI.
| Data | Sherwood | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 33,082 | 39,873 |
| Median Age | 39.1 years | 39.6 years |
| Median Income | $74,917 | $87,961 |
| Married Families | 40.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Waipahu
- The population in Waipahu is higher at 39,873, compared to 33,082 in Sherwood.
- The median age in Waipahu is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 39.1 years in Sherwood.
- Waipahu has a higher median income of $87,961, compared to $74,917 in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 40.0% compared to 38.0% in Waipahu.
- The poverty level is higher in Waipahu at 10%, compared to 9% in Sherwood.
- Waipahu has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.3% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Waipahu provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Sherwood | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 28 | 1 |
| White | 64 | 11 |
| Asian | 1 | 67 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 6 |
| Two or More Races | 4 | 15 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Waipahu
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sherwood at 28% compared to 1% in Waipahu.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 11% in Waipahu.
- In Waipahu, the Asian population stands at 67%, greater than 1% in Sherwood.
- Waipahu has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 6%, compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Waipahu at 15%, compared to 4% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sherwood and Waipahu at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Sherwood | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 12.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 8.3% |
| Depression | 23.9% | 10.2% |
| Smoking | 18.0% | 12.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 14.8% |
| Obesity | 35.7% | 22.4% |
| Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Waipahu
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 12.7% in Waipahu.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sherwood at 23.9% compared to 10.2% in Waipahu.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 18.0% compared to 12.9% in Waipahu.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Waipahu at 14.8% compared to 14.6% in Sherwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 35.7% compared to 22.4% in Waipahu.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sherwood at 16.0% compared to 14.0% in Waipahu.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Sherwood | Waipahu |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (212) | 1.8% (729) |
| High School Diploma | 13.9% (4,592) | 22.1% (8,831) |
| Less than High School | 6.9% (2,280) | 11.0% (4,392) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (7,568) | 13.0% (5,195) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Waipahu
- In Waipahu, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.6% in Sherwood.
- In Waipahu, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 22.1% compared to 13.9% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Waipahu at 11.0%, compared to 6.9% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 22.9% compared to 13.0% in Waipahu.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.