Demographics details for Sherwood, AR vs San dimas, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, AR vs San dimas, CA.
Data | Sherwood | San dimas |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,082 | 33,535 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 42.7 years |
Median Income | $74,917 | $102,241 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 9% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 5.2 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs San dimas
- The population in San dimas is higher at 33,535, compared to 33,082 in Sherwood.
- The median age in San dimas is higher at 42.7 years, compared to 39.1 years in Sherwood.
- San dimas has a higher median income of $102,241, compared to $74,917 in Sherwood.
- In San dimas, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 40.0% in Sherwood.
- The poverty level is identical in both Sherwood and San dimas at 9%.
- San dimas has a higher unemployment rate at 5.2% compared to 3.3% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs San dimas provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sherwood | San dimas |
---|---|---|
Black | 28 | 3 |
White | 64 | 25 |
Asian | 1 | 16 |
Hispanic | 3 | 37 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 18 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs San dimas
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sherwood at 28% compared to 3% in San dimas.
- Sherwood has a higher percentage of White residents at 64% compared to 25% in San dimas.
- In San dimas, the Asian population stands at 16%, greater than 1% in Sherwood.
- San dimas has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 37%, compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in San dimas at 18%, compared to 4% in Sherwood.
- In San dimas, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Sherwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sherwood | San dimas |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 14.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 9.5% |
Depression | 23.9% | 16.6% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 9.3% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 16.7% |
Obesity | 35.7% | 26.3% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 15.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs San dimas
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 14.6% in San dimas.
- Depression is more prevalent in Sherwood at 23.9% compared to 16.6% in San dimas.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 18.0% compared to 9.3% in San dimas.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in San dimas at 16.7% compared to 14.6% in Sherwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 35.7% compared to 26.3% in San dimas.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sherwood at 16.0% compared to 15.0% in San dimas.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sherwood | San dimas |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (212) | 1.1% (362) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (4,592) | 13.8% (4,634) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (2,280) | 8.5% (2,851) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (7,568) | 28.3% (9,476) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs San dimas
- In San dimas, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.6% in Sherwood.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood hold a high school diploma at 13.9% compared to 13.8% in San dimas.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in San dimas at 8.5%, compared to 6.9% in Sherwood.
- In San dimas, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 28.3% compared to 22.9% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.