Demographics details for Sherwood, AR vs Billings, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sherwood, AR vs Billings, MT.
Data | Sherwood | Billings |
---|---|---|
Population | 33,082 | 119,960 |
Median Age | 39.1 years | 37.7 years |
Median Income | $74,917 | $69,692 |
Married Families | 40.0% | 37.0% |
Poverty Level | 9% | 10% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.3 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Sherwood vs Billings
- The population in Billings is higher at 119,960, compared to 33,082 in Sherwood.
- Residents in Sherwood have a higher median age of 39.1 years compared to 37.7 years in Billings.
- Sherwood has a higher median income of $74,917 compared to $69,692 in Billings.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Sherwood at 40.0% compared to 37.0% in Billings.
- The poverty level is higher in Billings at 10%, compared to 9% in Sherwood.
- Billings has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.3% in Sherwood.
Demographics
Demographics Sherwood vs Billings provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sherwood | Billings |
---|---|---|
Black | 28 | 1 |
White | 64 | 82 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 4 | 5 |
American Indian | Data is updating | 4 |
Demographics Comparison: Sherwood vs Billings
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sherwood at 28% compared to 1% in Billings.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Billings at 82% compared to 64% in Sherwood.
- Both Sherwood and Billings have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Billings has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Sherwood.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Billings at 5%, compared to 4% in Sherwood.
- In Billings, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 4%, compared to 0% in Sherwood.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sherwood | Billings |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.8% | 16.6% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.1% | 11.1% |
Depression | 23.9% | 27.8% |
Smoking | 18.0% | 16.1% |
Binge Drinking | 14.6% | 22.9% |
Obesity | 35.7% | 32.9% |
Disability Percentage | 16.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sherwood vs Billings
- More residents in Sherwood report poor mental health at 16.8% compared to 16.6% in Billings.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Billings at 27.8% versus 23.9% in Sherwood.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Sherwood at 18.0% compared to 16.1% in Billings.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Billings at 22.9% compared to 14.6% in Sherwood.
- Obesity rates are higher in Sherwood at 35.7% compared to 32.9% in Billings.
- Disability percentages are higher in Sherwood at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Billings.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sherwood | Billings |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (212) | 0.3% (321) |
High School Diploma | 13.9% (4,592) | 14.7% (17,691) |
Less than High School | 6.9% (2,280) | 5.4% (6,502) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 22.9% (7,568) | 24.8% (29,705) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sherwood vs Billings
- A higher percentage of residents in Sherwood have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Billings.
- In Billings, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 14.7% compared to 13.9% in Sherwood.
- More residents in Sherwood have less than a high school education at 6.9% compared to 5.4% in Billings.
- In Billings, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 24.8% compared to 22.9% in Sherwood.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.