Demographics details for Shepherd, MT vs Port gibson, MS
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shepherd, MT vs Port gibson, MS.
Data | Shepherd | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
Population | 772 | 1,206 |
Median Age | 40.5 years | 47.3 years |
Median Income | $125,179 | $24,773 |
Married Families | 47.0% | 22.0% |
Poverty Level | 5% | 30% |
Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.3 |
Population Comparison: Shepherd vs Port gibson
- The population in Port gibson is higher at 1,206, compared to 772 in Shepherd.
- The median age in Port gibson is higher at 47.3 years, compared to 40.5 years in Shepherd.
- Shepherd has a higher median income of $125,179 compared to $24,773 in Port gibson.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shepherd at 47.0% compared to 22.0% in Port gibson.
- The poverty level is higher in Port gibson at 30%, compared to 5% in Shepherd.
- Port gibson has a higher unemployment rate at 5.3% compared to 2.5% in Shepherd.
Demographics
Demographics Shepherd vs Port gibson provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shepherd | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 82 |
White | 86 | 12 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | Data is updating | 6 |
American Indian | 14 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shepherd vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 82% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- Shepherd has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 12% in Port gibson.
- Both Shepherd and Port gibson have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The percentage of Hispanic residents is the same in both Shepherd and Port gibson at 0%.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Port gibson at 6%, compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shepherd at 14% compared to 0% in Port gibson.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shepherd | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 19.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 16.0% |
Depression | 28.0% | 20.0% |
Smoking | 16.7% | 24.8% |
Binge Drinking | 23.7% | 10.2% |
Obesity | 33.2% | 50.5% |
Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 23.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shepherd vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.0% compared to 16.7% in Shepherd.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shepherd at 28.0% compared to 20.0% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has a higher smoking rate at 24.8% compared to 16.7% in Shepherd.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shepherd at 23.7% compared to 10.2% in Port gibson.
- Port gibson has higher obesity rates at 50.5% compared to 33.2% in Shepherd.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Port gibson at 23.0% compared to 6.0% in Shepherd.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shepherd | Port gibson |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.5% (6) |
High School Diploma | 16.2% (125) | 9.8% (118) |
Less than High School | 8.0% (62) | 13.3% (160) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (138) | 21.2% (256) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shepherd vs Port gibson
- In Port gibson, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.5% compared to 0.0% in Shepherd.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shepherd hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 9.8% in Port gibson.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Port gibson at 13.3%, compared to 8.0% in Shepherd.
- In Port gibson, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 21.2% compared to 17.9% in Shepherd.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.