Demographics details for Shepherd, MT vs Parnell, MO
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shepherd, MT vs Parnell, MO.
| Data | Shepherd | Parnell |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 772 | 134 |
| Median Age | 40.5 years | 31.5 years |
| Median Income | $125,179 | $38,393 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 51.0% |
| Poverty Level | 5% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 3.2 |
Population Comparison: Shepherd vs Parnell
- In Shepherd, the population is higher at 772, compared to 134 in Parnell.
- Residents in Shepherd have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 31.5 years in Parnell.
- Shepherd has a higher median income of $125,179 compared to $38,393 in Parnell.
- In Parnell, the percentage of married families is higher at 51.0%, compared to 47.0% in Shepherd.
- The poverty level is higher in Parnell at 10%, compared to 5% in Shepherd.
- Parnell has a higher unemployment rate at 3.2% compared to 2.5% in Shepherd.
Demographics
Demographics Shepherd vs Parnell provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shepherd | Parnell |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 86 | 69 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 1 |
| Hispanic | Data is updating | 9 |
| Two or More Races | Data is updating | 21 |
| American Indian | 14 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shepherd vs Parnell
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Shepherd and Parnell at 0%.
- Shepherd has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 69% in Parnell.
- In Parnell, the Asian population stands at 1%, greater than 0% in Shepherd.
- Parnell has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 9%, compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Parnell at 21%, compared to 0% in Shepherd.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shepherd at 14% compared to 0% in Parnell.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shepherd | Parnell |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 16.7% | 18.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 11.2% | 13.3% |
| Depression | 28.0% | 24.2% |
| Smoking | 16.7% | 22.0% |
| Binge Drinking | 23.7% | 18.2% |
| Obesity | 33.2% | 39.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 6.0% | 24.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shepherd vs Parnell
- In Parnell, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 18.5% compared to 16.7% in Shepherd.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shepherd at 28.0% compared to 24.2% in Parnell.
- Parnell has a higher smoking rate at 22.0% compared to 16.7% in Shepherd.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shepherd at 23.7% compared to 18.2% in Parnell.
- Parnell has higher obesity rates at 39.7% compared to 33.2% in Shepherd.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parnell at 24.0% compared to 6.0% in Shepherd.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shepherd | Parnell |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.0% (Data is updating) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 16.2% (125) | 46.3% (62) |
| Less than High School | 8.0% (62) | 7.5% (10) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 17.9% (138) | 11.2% (15) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shepherd vs Parnell
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Shepherd and Parnell at 0.0%.
- In Parnell, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 46.3% compared to 16.2% in Shepherd.
- More residents in Shepherd have less than a high school education at 8.0% compared to 7.5% in Parnell.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shepherd hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 11.2% in Parnell.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.