Demographics details for Shepherd, MT vs Havelock, NC

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shepherd, MT vs Havelock, NC.

Data Shepherd Havelock
Population 772 16,188
Median Age 40.5 years 23.8 years
Median Income $125,179 $56,492
Married Families 47.0% 41.0%
Poverty Level 5% 12%
Unemployment Rate 2.5 4.5

Population Comparison: Shepherd vs Havelock

  • The population in Havelock is higher at 16,188, compared to 772 in Shepherd.
  • Residents in Shepherd have a higher median age of 40.5 years compared to 23.8 years in Havelock.
  • Shepherd has a higher median income of $125,179 compared to $56,492 in Havelock.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Shepherd at 47.0% compared to 41.0% in Havelock.
  • The poverty level is higher in Havelock at 12%, compared to 5% in Shepherd.
  • Havelock has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 2.5% in Shepherd.

Demographics

Demographics Shepherd vs Havelock provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shepherd Havelock
Black Data is updating 17
White 86 50
Asian Data is updating 4
Hispanic Data is updating 17
Two or More Races Data is updating 11
American Indian 14 1

Demographics Comparison: Shepherd vs Havelock

  • In Havelock, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 17% compared to 0% in Shepherd.
  • Shepherd has a higher percentage of White residents at 86% compared to 50% in Havelock.
  • In Havelock, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 0% in Shepherd.
  • Havelock has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 17%, compared to 0% in Shepherd.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Havelock at 11%, compared to 0% in Shepherd.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shepherd at 14% compared to 1% in Havelock.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shepherd Havelock
Mental Health Not Good 16.7% 15.7%
Physical Health Not Good 11.2% 11.0%
Depression 28.0% 22.5%
Smoking 16.7% 17.0%
Binge Drinking 23.7% 17.8%
Obesity 33.2% 37.2%
Disability Percentage 6.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shepherd vs Havelock

  • More residents in Shepherd report poor mental health at 16.7% compared to 15.7% in Havelock.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shepherd at 28.0% compared to 22.5% in Havelock.
  • Havelock has a higher smoking rate at 17.0% compared to 16.7% in Shepherd.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shepherd at 23.7% compared to 17.8% in Havelock.
  • Havelock has higher obesity rates at 37.2% compared to 33.2% in Shepherd.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Havelock at 9.0% compared to 6.0% in Shepherd.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shepherd Havelock
No Schooling 0.0% (Data is updating) 0.3% (53)
High School Diploma 16.2% (125) 11.8% (1,910)
Less than High School 8.0% (62) 4.4% (720)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 17.9% (138) 8.0% (1,291)

Education Levels Comparison: Shepherd vs Havelock

  • In Havelock, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.3% compared to 0.0% in Shepherd.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shepherd hold a high school diploma at 16.2% compared to 11.8% in Havelock.
  • More residents in Shepherd have less than a high school education at 8.0% compared to 4.4% in Havelock.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shepherd hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.9% compared to 8.0% in Havelock.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.