Demographics details for Shelton, WA vs Live oak, FL
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelton, WA vs Live oak, FL.
| Data | Shelton | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,814 | 7,034 |
| Median Age | 31.2 years | 37.5 years |
| Median Income | $57,907 | $43,664 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 31.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 16% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.4 | 4.2 |
Population Comparison: Shelton vs Live oak
- In Shelton, the population is higher at 10,814, compared to 7,034 in Live oak.
- The median age in Live oak is higher at 37.5 years, compared to 31.2 years in Shelton.
- Shelton has a higher median income of $57,907 compared to $43,664 in Live oak.
- In Live oak, the percentage of married families is higher at 31.0%, compared to 25.0% in Shelton.
- The poverty level is higher in Live oak at 16%, compared to 12% in Shelton.
- The unemployment rate in Shelton is higher at 5.4%, compared to 4.2% in Live oak.
Demographics
Demographics Shelton vs Live oak provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelton | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 38 |
| White | 61 | 41 |
| Asian | 1 | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 25 | 9 |
| Two or More Races | 9 | 12 |
| American Indian | 3 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shelton vs Live oak
- In Live oak, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 38% compared to 1% in Shelton.
- Shelton has a higher percentage of White residents at 61% compared to 41% in Live oak.
- The Asian population is larger in Shelton at 1% compared to 0% in Live oak.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shelton at 25% compared to 9% in Live oak.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Live oak at 12%, compared to 9% in Shelton.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelton at 3% compared to 0% in Live oak.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelton | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.5% | 17.0% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.5% | 12.4% |
| Depression | 29.0% | 19.3% |
| Smoking | 21.9% | 22.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.0% | 14.9% |
| Obesity | 37.9% | 37.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 17.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelton vs Live oak
- More residents in Shelton report poor mental health at 20.5% compared to 17.0% in Live oak.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelton at 29.0% compared to 19.3% in Live oak.
- Live oak has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 21.9% in Shelton.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shelton at 16.0% compared to 14.9% in Live oak.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shelton at 37.9% compared to 37.1% in Live oak.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelton at 17.0% compared to 12.0% in Live oak.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelton | Live oak |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 2.9% (318) | 2.1% (147) |
| High School Diploma | 14.3% (1,548) | 25.0% (1,755) |
| Less than High School | 18.4% (1,988) | 11.3% (796) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.2% (1,208) | 7.7% (545) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelton vs Live oak
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelton have no formal schooling at 2.9% compared to 2.1% in Live oak.
- In Live oak, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 25.0% compared to 14.3% in Shelton.
- More residents in Shelton have less than a high school education at 18.4% compared to 11.3% in Live oak.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelton hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.2% compared to 7.7% in Live oak.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.