Demographics details for Shelbyville, TN vs Union city, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, TN vs Union city, CA.
| Data | Shelbyville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,452 | 67,039 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 41.3 years |
| Median Income | $50,694 | $138,013 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 4.7 |
Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs Union city
- The population in Union city is higher at 67,039, compared to 24,452 in Shelbyville.
- The median age in Union city is higher at 41.3 years, compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
- Union city has a higher median income of $138,013, compared to $50,694 in Shelbyville.
- In Union city, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 9% in Union city.
- Union city has a higher unemployment rate at 4.7% compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbyville vs Union city provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbyville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 5 |
| White | 51 | 6 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 58 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 21 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Union city
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbyville at 11% compared to 5% in Union city.
- Shelbyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 6% in Union city.
- In Union city, the Asian population stands at 58%, greater than 0% in Shelbyville.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shelbyville at 24% compared to 21% in Union city.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shelbyville at 12% compared to 9% in Union city.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbyville at 2% compared to 1% in Union city.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbyville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 12.8% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 8.0% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 13.9% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 8.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 13.7% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 21.7% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 9.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Union city
- More residents in Shelbyville report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 12.8% in Union city.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 27.5% compared to 13.9% in Union city.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 25.2% compared to 8.6% in Union city.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shelbyville at 14.3% compared to 13.7% in Union city.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shelbyville at 39.4% compared to 21.7% in Union city.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelbyville at 13.0% compared to 9.0% in Union city.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbyville | Union city |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (185) | 2.7% (1,812) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (5,273) | 14.2% (9,499) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (5,051) | 15.3% (10,264) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (1,889) | 34.7% (23,285) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs Union city
- In Union city, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.8% in Shelbyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 14.2% in Union city.
- More residents in Shelbyville have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 15.3% in Union city.
- In Union city, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 34.7% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.