Demographics details for Shelbyville, TN vs Piggott, AR
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, TN vs Piggott, AR.
| Data | Shelbyville | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,452 | 3,545 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 37.6 years |
| Median Income | $50,694 | $43,255 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 35.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 15% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs Piggott
- In Shelbyville, the population is higher at 24,452, compared to 3,545 in Piggott.
- The median age in Piggott is higher at 37.6 years, compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher median income of $50,694 compared to $43,255 in Piggott.
- In Piggott, the percentage of married families is higher at 35.0%, compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
- The poverty level is identical in both Shelbyville and Piggott at 15%.
- Piggott has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbyville vs Piggott provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbyville | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | Data is updating |
| White | 51 | 96 |
| Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| Hispanic | 24 | 1 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 2 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Piggott
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbyville at 11% compared to 0% in Piggott.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Piggott at 96% compared to 51% in Shelbyville.
- Both Shelbyville and Piggott have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shelbyville at 24% compared to 1% in Piggott.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shelbyville at 12% compared to 2% in Piggott.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbyville at 2% compared to 1% in Piggott.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbyville | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 20.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.7% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 29.5% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 23.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 15.0% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 39.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Piggott
- In Piggott, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.7% compared to 20.3% in Shelbyville.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Piggott at 29.5% versus 27.5% in Shelbyville.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 25.2% compared to 23.9% in Piggott.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Piggott at 15.0% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shelbyville at 39.4% compared to 39.2% in Piggott.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Piggott at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Shelbyville.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbyville | Piggott |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (185) | 0.4% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (5,273) | 21.0% (746) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (5,051) | 11.9% (423) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (1,889) | 11.7% (414) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs Piggott
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.4% in Piggott.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 21.0% in Piggott.
- More residents in Shelbyville have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 11.9% in Piggott.
- In Piggott, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 11.7% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.