Demographics details for Shelbyville, TN vs Monroe center, IL

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, TN vs Monroe center, IL.

Data Shelbyville Monroe center
Population 24,452 410
Median Age 31.3 years 39.6 years
Median Income $50,694 $86,375
Married Families 25.0% 56.0%
Poverty Level 15% 5%
Unemployment Rate 3.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs Monroe center

  • In Shelbyville, the population is higher at 24,452, compared to 410 in Monroe center.
  • The median age in Monroe center is higher at 39.6 years, compared to 31.3 years in Shelbyville.
  • Monroe center has a higher median income of $86,375, compared to $50,694 in Shelbyville.
  • In Monroe center, the percentage of married families is higher at 56.0%, compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
  • Shelbyville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 5% in Monroe center.
  • Monroe center has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.

Demographics

Demographics Shelbyville vs Monroe center provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shelbyville Monroe center
Black 11 Data is updating
White 51 96
Asian Data is updating Data is updating
Hispanic 24 2
Two or More Races 12 2
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Monroe center

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbyville at 11% compared to 0% in Monroe center.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Monroe center at 96% compared to 51% in Shelbyville.
  • Both Shelbyville and Monroe center have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Shelbyville at 24% compared to 2% in Monroe center.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Shelbyville at 12% compared to 2% in Monroe center.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbyville at 2% compared to 0% in Monroe center.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shelbyville Monroe center
Mental Health Not Good 20.3% 16.4%
Physical Health Not Good 15.6% 10.9%
Depression 27.5% 21.7%
Smoking 25.2% 17.3%
Binge Drinking 14.3% 18.7%
Obesity 39.4% 34.5%
Disability Percentage 13.0% 16.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Monroe center

  • More residents in Shelbyville report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 16.4% in Monroe center.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 27.5% compared to 21.7% in Monroe center.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 25.2% compared to 17.3% in Monroe center.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Monroe center at 18.7% compared to 14.3% in Shelbyville.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shelbyville at 39.4% compared to 34.5% in Monroe center.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Monroe center at 16.0% compared to 13.0% in Shelbyville.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shelbyville Monroe center
No Schooling 0.8% (185) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 21.6% (5,273) 20.5% (84)
Less than High School 20.7% (5,051) 7.8% (32)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 7.7% (1,889) 17.1% (70)

Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs Monroe center

  • A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville have no formal schooling at 0.8% compared to 0.0% in Monroe center.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 20.5% in Monroe center.
  • More residents in Shelbyville have less than a high school education at 20.7% compared to 7.8% in Monroe center.
  • In Monroe center, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 17.1% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.