Demographics details for Shelbyville, TN vs Guymon, OK
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, TN vs Guymon, OK.
| Data | Shelbyville | Guymon |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 24,452 | 12,378 |
| Median Age | 31.3 years | 30.8 years |
| Median Income | $50,694 | $55,526 |
| Married Families | 25.0% | 32.0% |
| Poverty Level | 15% | 11% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs Guymon
- In Shelbyville, the population is higher at 24,452, compared to 12,378 in Guymon.
- Residents in Shelbyville have a higher median age of 31.3 years compared to 30.8 years in Guymon.
- Guymon has a higher median income of $55,526, compared to $50,694 in Shelbyville.
- In Guymon, the percentage of married families is higher at 32.0%, compared to 25.0% in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher poverty level at 15% compared to 11% in Guymon.
- Guymon has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.1% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbyville vs Guymon provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbyville | Guymon |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 11 | 10 |
| White | 51 | 13 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 24 | 57 |
| Two or More Races | 12 | 16 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Guymon
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbyville at 11% compared to 10% in Guymon.
- Shelbyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 51% compared to 13% in Guymon.
- In Guymon, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Shelbyville.
- Guymon has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 57%, compared to 24% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Guymon at 16%, compared to 12% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shelbyville and Guymon at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbyville | Guymon |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 20.3% | 18.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 15.6% | 14.9% |
| Depression | 27.5% | 22.3% |
| Smoking | 25.2% | 20.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 14.3% | 12.8% |
| Obesity | 39.4% | 45.8% |
| Disability Percentage | 13.0% | 10.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Guymon
- More residents in Shelbyville report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 18.1% in Guymon.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 27.5% compared to 22.3% in Guymon.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 25.2% compared to 20.6% in Guymon.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shelbyville at 14.3% compared to 12.8% in Guymon.
- Guymon has higher obesity rates at 45.8% compared to 39.4% in Shelbyville.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelbyville at 13.0% compared to 10.0% in Guymon.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbyville | Guymon |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.8% (185) | 1.8% (227) |
| High School Diploma | 21.6% (5,273) | 15.0% (1,853) |
| Less than High School | 20.7% (5,051) | 35.4% (4,377) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 7.7% (1,889) | 12.6% (1,562) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs Guymon
- In Guymon, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.8% in Shelbyville.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a high school diploma at 21.6% compared to 15.0% in Guymon.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Guymon at 35.4%, compared to 20.7% in Shelbyville.
- In Guymon, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 12.6% compared to 7.7% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.