Demographics details for Shelbyville, IN vs Watauga, TX
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, IN vs Watauga, TX.
| Data | Shelbyville | Watauga |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 20,159 | 23,050 |
| Median Age | 35.6 years | 35.8 years |
| Median Income | $55,850 | $88,775 |
| Married Families | 38.0% | 43.0% |
| Poverty Level | 8% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.2 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs Watauga
- The population in Watauga is higher at 23,050, compared to 20,159 in Shelbyville.
- The median age in Watauga is higher at 35.8 years, compared to 35.6 years in Shelbyville.
- Watauga has a higher median income of $88,775, compared to $55,850 in Shelbyville.
- In Watauga, the percentage of married families is higher at 43.0%, compared to 38.0% in Shelbyville.
- The poverty level is higher in Watauga at 10%, compared to 8% in Shelbyville.
- Watauga has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Shelbyville.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbyville vs Watauga provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbyville | Watauga |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 3 | 8 |
| White | 83 | 46 |
| Asian | 2 | 4 |
| Hispanic | 9 | 28 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 12 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Watauga
- In Watauga, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 3% in Shelbyville.
- Shelbyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 46% in Watauga.
- In Watauga, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 2% in Shelbyville.
- Watauga has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 28%, compared to 9% in Shelbyville.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Watauga at 12%, compared to 3% in Shelbyville.
- In Watauga, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 2%, compared to 0% in Shelbyville.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbyville | Watauga |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 18.1% | 16.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 12.6% | 11.0% |
| Depression | 26.8% | 23.6% |
| Smoking | 21.7% | 15.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 16.4% | 18.0% |
| Obesity | 41.5% | 33.1% |
| Disability Percentage | 15.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Watauga
- More residents in Shelbyville report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 16.5% in Watauga.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 26.8% compared to 23.6% in Watauga.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 21.7% compared to 15.4% in Watauga.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Watauga at 18.0% compared to 16.4% in Shelbyville.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shelbyville at 41.5% compared to 33.1% in Watauga.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelbyville at 15.0% compared to 11.0% in Watauga.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbyville | Watauga |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 1.1% (212) | 0.7% (166) |
| High School Diploma | 24.9% (5,016) | 17.6% (4,050) |
| Less than High School | 17.0% (3,430) | 12.7% (2,930) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 11.8% (2,384) | 16.8% (3,869) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs Watauga
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.7% in Watauga.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 17.6% in Watauga.
- More residents in Shelbyville have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 12.7% in Watauga.
- In Watauga, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.8% compared to 11.8% in Shelbyville.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.