Demographics details for Shelbyville, IN vs Richmond hill, GA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shelbyville, IN vs Richmond hill, GA.

Data Shelbyville Richmond hill
Population 20,159 18,091
Median Age 35.6 years 31.0 years
Median Income $55,850 $83,519
Married Families 38.0% 35.0%
Poverty Level 8% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.2 3.5

Population Comparison: Shelbyville vs Richmond hill

  • In Shelbyville, the population is higher at 20,159, compared to 18,091 in Richmond hill.
  • Residents in Shelbyville have a higher median age of 35.6 years compared to 31.0 years in Richmond hill.
  • Richmond hill has a higher median income of $83,519, compared to $55,850 in Shelbyville.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Shelbyville at 38.0% compared to 35.0% in Richmond hill.
  • The poverty level is higher in Richmond hill at 10%, compared to 8% in Shelbyville.
  • Richmond hill has a higher unemployment rate at 3.5% compared to 3.2% in Shelbyville.

Demographics

Demographics Shelbyville vs Richmond hill provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shelbyville Richmond hill
Black 3 13
White 83 66
Asian 2 2
Hispanic 9 11
Two or More Races 3 8
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Richmond hill

  • In Richmond hill, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 13% compared to 3% in Shelbyville.
  • Shelbyville has a higher percentage of White residents at 83% compared to 66% in Richmond hill.
  • Both Shelbyville and Richmond hill have the same percentage of Asian residents at 2%.
  • Richmond hill has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 11%, compared to 9% in Shelbyville.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Richmond hill at 8%, compared to 3% in Shelbyville.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shelbyville and Richmond hill at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shelbyville Richmond hill
Mental Health Not Good 18.1% 15.9%
Physical Health Not Good 12.6% 10.6%
Depression 26.8% 21.8%
Smoking 21.7% 14.2%
Binge Drinking 16.4% 16.2%
Obesity 41.5% 34.4%
Disability Percentage 15.0% 9.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbyville vs Richmond hill

  • More residents in Shelbyville report poor mental health at 18.1% compared to 15.9% in Richmond hill.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 26.8% compared to 21.8% in Richmond hill.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbyville at 21.7% compared to 14.2% in Richmond hill.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shelbyville at 16.4% compared to 16.2% in Richmond hill.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shelbyville at 41.5% compared to 34.4% in Richmond hill.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Shelbyville at 15.0% compared to 9.0% in Richmond hill.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shelbyville Richmond hill
No Schooling 1.1% (212) 0.0% (9)
High School Diploma 24.9% (5,016) 7.7% (1,395)
Less than High School 17.0% (3,430) 5.7% (1,037)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 11.8% (2,384) 19.5% (3,532)

Education Levels Comparison: Shelbyville vs Richmond hill

  • A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville have no formal schooling at 1.1% compared to 0.0% in Richmond hill.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shelbyville hold a high school diploma at 24.9% compared to 7.7% in Richmond hill.
  • More residents in Shelbyville have less than a high school education at 17.0% compared to 5.7% in Richmond hill.
  • In Richmond hill, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.5% compared to 11.8% in Shelbyville.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.