Demographics details for Shelby, IA vs Fontana, CA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelby, IA vs Fontana, CA.
| Data | Shelby | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 11,645 | 212,475 |
| Median Age | 45.5 years | 32.6 years |
| Median Income | $70,295 | $93,230 |
| Married Families | 47.0% | 36.0% |
| Poverty Level | 9% | 13% |
| Unemployment Rate | 2.5 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Shelby vs Fontana
- The population in Fontana is higher at 212,475, compared to 11,645 in Shelby.
- Residents in Shelby have a higher median age of 45.5 years compared to 32.6 years in Fontana.
- Fontana has a higher median income of $93,230, compared to $70,295 in Shelby.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shelby at 47.0% compared to 36.0% in Fontana.
- The poverty level is higher in Fontana at 13%, compared to 9% in Shelby.
- Fontana has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 2.5% in Shelby.
Demographics
Demographics Shelby vs Fontana provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelby | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 1 | 8 |
| White | 93 | 2 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 68 |
| Two or More Races | 3 | 14 |
| American Indian | Data is updating | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelby vs Fontana
- In Fontana, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 1% in Shelby.
- Shelby has a higher percentage of White residents at 93% compared to 2% in Fontana.
- In Fontana, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Shelby.
- Fontana has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 68%, compared to 3% in Shelby.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Fontana at 14%, compared to 3% in Shelby.
- In Fontana, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 1%, compared to 0% in Shelby.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelby | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 15.2% | 16.2% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 9.5% | 12.6% |
| Depression | 18.1% | 17.0% |
| Smoking | 17.2% | 12.4% |
| Binge Drinking | 22.5% | 15.1% |
| Obesity | 36.7% | 38.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 11.0% | 8.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelby vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 16.2% compared to 15.2% in Shelby.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelby at 18.1% compared to 17.0% in Fontana.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelby at 17.2% compared to 12.4% in Fontana.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shelby at 22.5% compared to 15.1% in Fontana.
- Fontana has higher obesity rates at 38.6% compared to 36.7% in Shelby.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelby at 11.0% compared to 8.0% in Fontana.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelby | Fontana |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (72) | 2.2% (4,748) |
| High School Diploma | 22.7% (2,641) | 16.3% (34,556) |
| Less than High School | 8.1% (941) | 25.3% (53,655) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 16.3% (1,898) | 12.0% (25,587) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelby vs Fontana
- In Fontana, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.2% compared to 0.6% in Shelby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelby hold a high school diploma at 22.7% compared to 16.3% in Fontana.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Fontana at 25.3%, compared to 8.1% in Shelby.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelby hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 16.3% compared to 12.0% in Fontana.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.