Demographics details for Shelbina, MO vs Syracuse, NY
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbina, MO vs Syracuse, NY.
| Data | Shelbina | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,582 | 144,451 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 31.9 years |
| Median Income | $52,050 | $43,584 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 22.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | Data is updating |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 5.1 |
Population Comparison: Shelbina vs Syracuse
- The population in Syracuse is higher at 144,451, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- Residents in Shelbina have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 31.9 years in Syracuse.
- Shelbina has a higher median income of $52,050 compared to $43,584 in Syracuse.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shelbina at 51.0% compared to 22.0% in Syracuse.
- Shelbina has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 0% in Syracuse.
- Syracuse has a higher unemployment rate at 5.1% compared to 3.5% in Shelbina.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbina vs Syracuse provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbina | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 29 |
| White | 89 | 45 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 7 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 10 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 8 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbina vs Syracuse
- In Syracuse, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 29% compared to 5% in Shelbina.
- Shelbina has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 45% in Syracuse.
- In Syracuse, the Asian population stands at 7%, greater than 0% in Shelbina.
- Syracuse has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 10%, compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Syracuse at 8%, compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbina at 2% compared to 1% in Syracuse.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbina | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 20.3% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 15.0% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 26.9% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | 26.9% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 14.0% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 42.6% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbina vs Syracuse
- In Syracuse, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.3% compared to 19.2% in Shelbina.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Syracuse at 26.9% versus 26.4% in Shelbina.
- Syracuse has a higher smoking rate at 26.9% compared to 23.4% in Shelbina.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shelbina at 17.6% compared to 14.0% in Syracuse.
- Syracuse has higher obesity rates at 42.6% compared to 39.6% in Shelbina.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 16.0% in Syracuse.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbina | Syracuse |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 1.8% (2,595) |
| High School Diploma | 31.1% (492) | 12.7% (18,391) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (279) | 14.1% (20,347) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (225) | 18.5% (26,759) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbina vs Syracuse
- In Syracuse, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.8% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbina hold a high school diploma at 31.1% compared to 12.7% in Syracuse.
- More residents in Shelbina have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 14.1% in Syracuse.
- In Syracuse, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.5% compared to 14.2% in Shelbina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.