Demographics details for Shelbina, MO vs Stanton, NE
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbina, MO vs Stanton, NE.
Data | Shelbina | Stanton |
---|---|---|
Population | 1,582 | 5,717 |
Median Age | 37.6 years | 41.4 years |
Median Income | $52,050 | $76,035 |
Married Families | 51.0% | 49.0% |
Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 2.6 |
Population Comparison: Shelbina vs Stanton
- The population in Stanton is higher at 5,717, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- The median age in Stanton is higher at 41.4 years, compared to 37.6 years in Shelbina.
- Stanton has a higher median income of $76,035, compared to $52,050 in Shelbina.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shelbina at 51.0% compared to 49.0% in Stanton.
- Shelbina has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Stanton.
- The unemployment rate in Shelbina is higher at 3.5%, compared to 2.6% in Stanton.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbina vs Stanton provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shelbina | Stanton |
---|---|---|
Black | 5 | 1 |
White | 89 | 89 |
Asian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
Two or More Races | 1 | 3 |
American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbina vs Stanton
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbina at 5% compared to 1% in Stanton.
- The percentage of White residents is the same in both Shelbina and Stanton at 89%.
- Both Shelbina and Stanton have the same percentage of Asian residents at 0%.
- Stanton has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Stanton at 3%, compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbina at 2% compared to 0% in Stanton.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shelbina | Stanton |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 13.3% |
Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 9.0% |
Depression | 26.4% | 16.2% |
Smoking | 23.4% | 15.1% |
Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 22.1% |
Obesity | 39.6% | 42.0% |
Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 12.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbina vs Stanton
- More residents in Shelbina report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 13.3% in Stanton.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelbina at 26.4% compared to 16.2% in Stanton.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbina at 23.4% compared to 15.1% in Stanton.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Stanton at 22.1% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- Stanton has higher obesity rates at 42.0% compared to 39.6% in Shelbina.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 12.0% in Stanton.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shelbina | Stanton |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.4% (25) |
High School Diploma | 31.1% (492) | 20.1% (1,147) |
Less than High School | 17.6% (279) | 8.2% (466) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (225) | 14.0% (800) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbina vs Stanton
- In Stanton, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.4% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbina hold a high school diploma at 31.1% compared to 20.1% in Stanton.
- More residents in Shelbina have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 8.2% in Stanton.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbina hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 14.0% in Stanton.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.