Demographics details for Shelbina, MO vs Laurel, MT
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbina, MO vs Laurel, MT.
| Data | Shelbina | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,582 | 7,203 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 36.5 years |
| Median Income | $52,050 | $62,250 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 37.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 7% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shelbina vs Laurel
- The population in Laurel is higher at 7,203, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- Residents in Shelbina have a higher median age of 37.6 years compared to 36.5 years in Laurel.
- Laurel has a higher median income of $62,250, compared to $52,050 in Shelbina.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shelbina at 51.0% compared to 37.0% in Laurel.
- Shelbina has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 7% in Laurel.
- The unemployment rate is the same in both Shelbina and Laurel at 3.5%.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbina vs Laurel provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbina | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | Data is updating |
| White | 89 | 83 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 2 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 7 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 7 |
| American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbina vs Laurel
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbina at 5% compared to 0% in Laurel.
- Shelbina has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 83% in Laurel.
- In Laurel, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 0% in Shelbina.
- Laurel has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 7%, compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Laurel at 7%, compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbina at 2% compared to 1% in Laurel.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbina | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 16.4% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 10.8% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 27.8% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | 15.8% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 23.8% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 32.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 13.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbina vs Laurel
- More residents in Shelbina report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 16.4% in Laurel.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Laurel at 27.8% versus 26.4% in Shelbina.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbina at 23.4% compared to 15.8% in Laurel.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Laurel at 23.8% compared to 17.6% in Shelbina.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shelbina at 39.6% compared to 32.2% in Laurel.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 13.0% in Laurel.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbina | Laurel |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 0.2% (14) |
| High School Diploma | 31.1% (492) | 21.7% (1,563) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (279) | 7.7% (556) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (225) | 10.8% (780) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbina vs Laurel
- The percentage of residents with no formal schooling is the same in both Shelbina and Laurel at 0.2%.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbina hold a high school diploma at 31.1% compared to 21.7% in Laurel.
- More residents in Shelbina have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 7.7% in Laurel.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbina hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 14.2% compared to 10.8% in Laurel.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.