Demographics details for Shelbina, MO vs Gardner, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shelbina, MO vs Gardner, MA.
| Data | Shelbina | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 1,582 | 20,902 |
| Median Age | 37.6 years | 45.0 years |
| Median Income | $52,050 | $56,974 |
| Married Families | 51.0% | 38.0% |
| Poverty Level | 11% | 9% |
| Unemployment Rate | 3.5 | 4.6 |
Population Comparison: Shelbina vs Gardner
- The population in Gardner is higher at 20,902, compared to 1,582 in Shelbina.
- The median age in Gardner is higher at 45.0 years, compared to 37.6 years in Shelbina.
- Gardner has a higher median income of $56,974, compared to $52,050 in Shelbina.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shelbina at 51.0% compared to 38.0% in Gardner.
- Shelbina has a higher poverty level at 11% compared to 9% in Gardner.
- Gardner has a higher unemployment rate at 4.6% compared to 3.5% in Shelbina.
Demographics
Demographics Shelbina vs Gardner provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shelbina | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Black | 5 | 2 |
| White | 89 | 82 |
| Asian | Data is updating | 3 |
| Hispanic | 3 | 8 |
| Two or More Races | 1 | 5 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shelbina vs Gardner
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Shelbina at 5% compared to 2% in Gardner.
- Shelbina has a higher percentage of White residents at 89% compared to 82% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, the Asian population stands at 3%, greater than 0% in Shelbina.
- Gardner has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 8%, compared to 3% in Shelbina.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Gardner at 5%, compared to 1% in Shelbina.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shelbina at 2% compared to 0% in Gardner.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shelbina | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.2% | 18.7% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 14.0% | 11.1% |
| Depression | 26.4% | 24.4% |
| Smoking | 23.4% | 17.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.6% | 17.6% |
| Obesity | 39.6% | 33.5% |
| Disability Percentage | 20.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shelbina vs Gardner
- More residents in Shelbina report poor mental health at 19.2% compared to 18.7% in Gardner.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shelbina at 26.4% compared to 24.4% in Gardner.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shelbina at 23.4% compared to 17.3% in Gardner.
- Binge drinking rates are similar in both Shelbina and Gardner at 17.6%.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shelbina at 39.6% compared to 33.5% in Gardner.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shelbina at 20.0% compared to 14.0% in Gardner.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shelbina | Gardner |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.2% (3) | 1.3% (276) |
| High School Diploma | 31.1% (492) | 21.5% (4,487) |
| Less than High School | 17.6% (279) | 16.8% (3,513) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 14.2% (225) | 15.0% (3,133) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shelbina vs Gardner
- In Gardner, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 1.3% compared to 0.2% in Shelbina.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shelbina hold a high school diploma at 31.1% compared to 21.5% in Gardner.
- More residents in Shelbina have less than a high school education at 17.6% compared to 16.8% in Gardner.
- In Gardner, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.0% compared to 14.2% in Shelbina.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.