Demographics details for Sheboygan, WI vs Parker, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Sheboygan, WI vs Parker, PA.
Data | Sheboygan | Parker |
---|---|---|
Population | 49,773 | 690 |
Median Age | 37.0 years | 45.7 years |
Median Income | $59,861 | $46,875 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 35.0% |
Poverty Level | 10% | 12% |
Unemployment Rate | 3.0 | 5.0 |
Population Comparison: Sheboygan vs Parker
- In Sheboygan, the population is higher at 49,773, compared to 690 in Parker.
- The median age in Parker is higher at 45.7 years, compared to 37.0 years in Sheboygan.
- Sheboygan has a higher median income of $59,861 compared to $46,875 in Parker.
- The percentage of married families is the same in both Sheboygan and Parker at 35.0%.
- The poverty level is higher in Parker at 12%, compared to 10% in Sheboygan.
- Parker has a higher unemployment rate at 5.0% compared to 3.0% in Sheboygan.
Demographics
Demographics Sheboygan vs Parker provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Sheboygan | Parker |
---|---|---|
Black | 3 | 2 |
White | 65 | 97 |
Asian | 12 | Data is updating |
Hispanic | 12 | Data is updating |
Two or More Races | 8 | 1 |
American Indian | Data is updating | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Sheboygan vs Parker
- A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sheboygan at 3% compared to 2% in Parker.
- The percentage of White residents is higher in Parker at 97% compared to 65% in Sheboygan.
- The Asian population is larger in Sheboygan at 12% compared to 0% in Parker.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Sheboygan at 12% compared to 0% in Parker.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Sheboygan at 8% compared to 1% in Parker.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sheboygan and Parker at 0%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Sheboygan | Parker |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 14.6% | 17.9% |
Physical Health Not Good | 9.9% | 12.5% |
Depression | 21.5% | 24.0% |
Smoking | 16.3% | 21.5% |
Binge Drinking | 22.8% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 33.1% | 36.2% |
Disability Percentage | 12.0% | 16.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Sheboygan vs Parker
- In Parker, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 17.9% compared to 14.6% in Sheboygan.
- Higher depression rates are seen in Parker at 24.0% versus 21.5% in Sheboygan.
- Parker has a higher smoking rate at 21.5% compared to 16.3% in Sheboygan.
- Binge drinking is more common in Sheboygan at 22.8% compared to 18.5% in Parker.
- Parker has higher obesity rates at 36.2% compared to 33.1% in Sheboygan.
- There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Parker at 16.0% compared to 12.0% in Sheboygan.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Sheboygan | Parker |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 1.5% (745) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
High School Diploma | 18.9% (9,403) | 32.2% (222) |
Less than High School | 9.9% (4,918) | 16.5% (114) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 15.3% (7,616) | 8.3% (57) |
Education Levels Comparison: Sheboygan vs Parker
- A higher percentage of residents in Sheboygan have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Parker.
- In Parker, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 32.2% compared to 18.9% in Sheboygan.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Parker at 16.5%, compared to 9.9% in Sheboygan.
- A higher percentage of residents in Sheboygan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.3% compared to 8.3% in Parker.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.