Demographics details for Sheboygan, WI vs Alum creek, WV

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Sheboygan, WI vs Alum creek, WV.

Data Sheboygan Alum creek
Population 49,773 1,420
Median Age 37.0 years 47.4 years
Median Income $59,861 $65,179
Married Families 35.0% 54.0%
Poverty Level 10% 10%
Unemployment Rate 3.0 4.5

Population Comparison: Sheboygan vs Alum creek

  • In Sheboygan, the population is higher at 49,773, compared to 1,420 in Alum creek.
  • The median age in Alum creek is higher at 47.4 years, compared to 37.0 years in Sheboygan.
  • Alum creek has a higher median income of $65,179, compared to $59,861 in Sheboygan.
  • In Alum creek, the percentage of married families is higher at 54.0%, compared to 35.0% in Sheboygan.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Sheboygan and Alum creek at 10%.
  • Alum creek has a higher unemployment rate at 4.5% compared to 3.0% in Sheboygan.

Demographics

Demographics Sheboygan vs Alum creek provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Sheboygan Alum creek
Black 3 Data is updating
White 65 100
Asian 12 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 Data is updating
Two or More Races 8 Data is updating
American Indian Data is updating Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Sheboygan vs Alum creek

  • A higher percentage of Black residents are in Sheboygan at 3% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Alum creek at 100% compared to 65% in Sheboygan.
  • The Asian population is larger in Sheboygan at 12% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Sheboygan at 12% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Sheboygan at 8% compared to 0% in Alum creek.
  • The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Sheboygan and Alum creek at 0%.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Sheboygan Alum creek
Mental Health Not Good 14.6% 20.2%
Physical Health Not Good 9.9% 13.5%
Depression 21.5% 29.5%
Smoking 16.3% 20.6%
Binge Drinking 22.8% 15.1%
Obesity 33.1% 40.1%
Disability Percentage 12.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Sheboygan vs Alum creek

  • In Alum creek, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.2% compared to 14.6% in Sheboygan.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Alum creek at 29.5% versus 21.5% in Sheboygan.
  • Alum creek has a higher smoking rate at 20.6% compared to 16.3% in Sheboygan.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Sheboygan at 22.8% compared to 15.1% in Alum creek.
  • Alum creek has higher obesity rates at 40.1% compared to 33.1% in Sheboygan.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Alum creek at 30.0% compared to 12.0% in Sheboygan.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Sheboygan Alum creek
No Schooling 1.5% (745) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 18.9% (9,403) 34.9% (496)
Less than High School 9.9% (4,918) 8.9% (126)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 15.3% (7,616) 9.7% (138)

Education Levels Comparison: Sheboygan vs Alum creek

  • A higher percentage of residents in Sheboygan have no formal schooling at 1.5% compared to 0.0% in Alum creek.
  • In Alum creek, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 34.9% compared to 18.9% in Sheboygan.
  • More residents in Sheboygan have less than a high school education at 9.9% compared to 8.9% in Alum creek.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Sheboygan hold a bachelor's degree or higher at 15.3% compared to 9.7% in Alum creek.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.