Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Trexlertown, PA

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Trexlertown, PA.

Data Shasta lake Trexlertown
Population 10,335 1,885
Median Age 38.8 years 34.6 years
Median Income $54,490 $93,472
Married Families 35.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 12% 4%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 3.5

Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown

  • In Shasta lake, the population is higher at 10,335, compared to 1,885 in Trexlertown.
  • Residents in Shasta lake have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 34.6 years in Trexlertown.
  • Trexlertown has a higher median income of $93,472, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
  • In Trexlertown, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Trexlertown.
  • The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Trexlertown.

Demographics

Demographics Shasta lake vs Trexlertown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shasta lake Trexlertown
Black Data is updating 18
White 74 65
Asian 1 11
Hispanic 12 5
Two or More Races 11 1
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown

  • In Trexlertown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 65% in Trexlertown.
  • In Trexlertown, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Shasta lake.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Shasta lake at 12% compared to 5% in Trexlertown.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 1% in Trexlertown.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 0% in Trexlertown.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shasta lake Trexlertown
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 13.5%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 8.2%
Depression 22.9% 19.9%
Smoking 17.4% 12.3%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 19.4%
Obesity 32.5% 28.2%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 3.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown

  • More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.5% in Trexlertown.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 22.9% compared to 19.9% in Trexlertown.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 17.4% compared to 12.3% in Trexlertown.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Trexlertown at 19.4% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shasta lake at 32.5% compared to 28.2% in Trexlertown.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 3.0% in Trexlertown.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shasta lake Trexlertown
No Schooling 0.6% (67) 0.0% (Data is updating)
High School Diploma 17.0% (1,759) 18.4% (347)
Less than High School 11.4% (1,176) 4.0% (76)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (946) 41.2% (776)

Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown

  • A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Trexlertown.
  • In Trexlertown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
  • More residents in Shasta lake have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 4.0% in Trexlertown.
  • In Trexlertown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.