Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Trexlertown, PA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Trexlertown, PA.
| Data | Shasta lake | Trexlertown |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,335 | 1,885 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 34.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,490 | $93,472 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 50.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 4% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.5 |
Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown
- In Shasta lake, the population is higher at 10,335, compared to 1,885 in Trexlertown.
- Residents in Shasta lake have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 34.6 years in Trexlertown.
- Trexlertown has a higher median income of $93,472, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
- In Trexlertown, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 4% in Trexlertown.
- The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.5% in Trexlertown.
Demographics
Demographics Shasta lake vs Trexlertown provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shasta lake | Trexlertown |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | 18 |
| White | 74 | 65 |
| Asian | 1 | 11 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 5 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 1 |
| American Indian | 2 | Data is updating |
Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown
- In Trexlertown, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 18% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 65% in Trexlertown.
- In Trexlertown, the Asian population stands at 11%, greater than 1% in Shasta lake.
- The Hispanic community is larger in Shasta lake at 12% compared to 5% in Trexlertown.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 1% in Trexlertown.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 0% in Trexlertown.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shasta lake | Trexlertown |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 13.5% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 8.2% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 19.9% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 12.3% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 19.4% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 28.2% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 3.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown
- More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.5% in Trexlertown.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 22.9% compared to 19.9% in Trexlertown.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 17.4% compared to 12.3% in Trexlertown.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Trexlertown at 19.4% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shasta lake at 32.5% compared to 28.2% in Trexlertown.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 3.0% in Trexlertown.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shasta lake | Trexlertown |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (67) | 0.0% (Data is updating) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,759) | 18.4% (347) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (1,176) | 4.0% (76) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (946) | 41.2% (776) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Trexlertown
- A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.0% in Trexlertown.
- In Trexlertown, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 18.4% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
- More residents in Shasta lake have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 4.0% in Trexlertown.
- In Trexlertown, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 41.2% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.