Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Surprise, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Surprise, AZ.
Data | Shasta lake | Surprise |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,335 | 154,198 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 41.5 years |
Median Income | $54,490 | $87,756 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 13% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 3.9 |
Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Surprise
- The population in Surprise is higher at 154,198, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
- The median age in Surprise is higher at 41.5 years, compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
- Surprise has a higher median income of $87,756, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
- In Surprise, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
- The poverty level is higher in Surprise at 13%, compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 3.9% in Surprise.
Demographics
Demographics Shasta lake vs Surprise provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shasta lake | Surprise |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 74 | 63 |
Asian | 1 | 2 |
Hispanic | 12 | 20 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Surprise
- In Surprise, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 63% in Surprise.
- In Surprise, the Asian population stands at 2%, greater than 1% in Shasta lake.
- Surprise has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 20%, compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 9% in Surprise.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 1% in Surprise.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shasta lake | Surprise |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 17.0% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 10.1% |
Depression | 22.9% | 20.1% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 14.4% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 18.5% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 30.1% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 11.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Surprise
- More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.0% in Surprise.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 22.9% compared to 20.1% in Surprise.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 17.4% compared to 14.4% in Surprise.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Surprise at 18.5% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
- Obesity rates are higher in Shasta lake at 32.5% compared to 30.1% in Surprise.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 11.0% in Surprise.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shasta lake | Surprise |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (67) | 0.5% (754) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,759) | 13.7% (21,050) |
Less than High School | 11.4% (1,176) | 7.6% (11,792) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (946) | 19.9% (30,735) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Surprise
- A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.5% in Surprise.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 13.7% in Surprise.
- More residents in Shasta lake have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 7.6% in Surprise.
- In Surprise, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.9% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.