Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Show low, AZ
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Show low, AZ.
| Data | Shasta lake | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Population | 10,335 | 12,056 |
| Median Age | 38.8 years | 43.6 years |
| Median Income | $54,490 | $57,406 |
| Married Families | 35.0% | 44.0% |
| Poverty Level | 12% | 10% |
| Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 4.5 |
Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Show low
- The population in Show low is higher at 12,056, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
- The median age in Show low is higher at 43.6 years, compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
- Show low has a higher median income of $57,406, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
- In Show low, the percentage of married families is higher at 44.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 10% in Show low.
- The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Show low.
Demographics
Demographics Shasta lake vs Show low provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
| Demographic | Shasta lake | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Black | Data is updating | Data is updating |
| White | 74 | 70 |
| Asian | 1 | 1 |
| Hispanic | 12 | 18 |
| Two or More Races | 11 | 9 |
| American Indian | 2 | 2 |
Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Show low
- The percentage of Black residents is the same in both Shasta lake and Show low at 0%.
- Shasta lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 70% in Show low.
- Both Shasta lake and Show low have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- Show low has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 18%, compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 9% in Show low.
- The percentage of American Indian residents is the same in both Shasta lake and Show low at 2%.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
| Health Metric | Shasta lake | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 17.1% |
| Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 11.4% |
| Depression | 22.9% | 20.7% |
| Smoking | 17.4% | 14.6% |
| Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 17.9% |
| Obesity | 32.5% | 32.9% |
| Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 17.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Show low
- More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 17.1% in Show low.
- Depression is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 22.9% compared to 20.7% in Show low.
- Smoking is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 17.4% compared to 14.6% in Show low.
- More residents engage in binge drinking in Show low at 17.9% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
- Show low has higher obesity rates at 32.9% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 17.0% in Show low.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
| Education Level | Shasta lake | Show low |
|---|---|---|
| No Schooling | 0.6% (67) | 0.1% (12) |
| High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,759) | 14.3% (1,726) |
| Less than High School | 11.4% (1,176) | 7.0% (844) |
| Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (946) | 19.1% (2,306) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Show low
- A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.1% in Show low.
- A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 14.3% in Show low.
- More residents in Shasta lake have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 7.0% in Show low.
- In Show low, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 19.1% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.