Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Park ridge, NJ

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Park ridge, NJ.

Data Shasta lake Park ridge
Population 10,335 9,426
Median Age 38.8 years 47.8 years
Median Income $54,490 $164,241
Married Families 35.0% 50.0%
Poverty Level 12% Data is updating
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.5

Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Park ridge

  • In Shasta lake, the population is higher at 10,335, compared to 9,426 in Park ridge.
  • The median age in Park ridge is higher at 47.8 years, compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
  • Park ridge has a higher median income of $164,241, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
  • In Park ridge, the percentage of married families is higher at 50.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher poverty level at 12% compared to 0% in Park ridge.
  • The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.5% in Park ridge.

Demographics

Demographics Shasta lake vs Park ridge provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shasta lake Park ridge
Black Data is updating 1
White 74 77
Asian 1 4
Hispanic 12 13
Two or More Races 11 5
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Park ridge

  • In Park ridge, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 1% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • The percentage of White residents is higher in Park ridge at 77% compared to 74% in Shasta lake.
  • In Park ridge, the Asian population stands at 4%, greater than 1% in Shasta lake.
  • Park ridge has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 13%, compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 5% in Park ridge.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 0% in Park ridge.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shasta lake Park ridge
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 13.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 7.4%
Depression 22.9% 17.8%
Smoking 17.4% 10.2%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 18.7%
Obesity 32.5% 24.6%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 5.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Park ridge

  • More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 13.1% in Park ridge.
  • Depression is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 22.9% compared to 17.8% in Park ridge.
  • Smoking is more prevalent in Shasta lake at 17.4% compared to 10.2% in Park ridge.
  • More residents engage in binge drinking in Park ridge at 18.7% compared to 17.5% in Shasta lake.
  • Obesity rates are higher in Shasta lake at 32.5% compared to 24.6% in Park ridge.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 5.0% in Park ridge.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shasta lake Park ridge
No Schooling 0.6% (67) 0.3% (27)
High School Diploma 17.0% (1,759) 12.4% (1,169)
Less than High School 11.4% (1,176) 5.8% (549)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (946) 37.8% (3,565)

Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Park ridge

  • A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake have no formal schooling at 0.6% compared to 0.3% in Park ridge.
  • A higher percentage of residents in Shasta lake hold a high school diploma at 17.0% compared to 12.4% in Park ridge.
  • More residents in Shasta lake have less than a high school education at 11.4% compared to 5.8% in Park ridge.
  • In Park ridge, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 37.8% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.