Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs New bedford, MA
Population Overview
Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs New bedford, MA.
Data | Shasta lake | New bedford |
---|---|---|
Population | 10,335 | 100,682 |
Median Age | 38.8 years | 36.8 years |
Median Income | $54,490 | $54,604 |
Married Families | 35.0% | 29.0% |
Poverty Level | 12% | 15% |
Unemployment Rate | 5.1 | 5.5 |
Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs New bedford
- The population in New bedford is higher at 100,682, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
- Residents in Shasta lake have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 36.8 years in New bedford.
- New bedford has a higher median income of $54,604, compared to $54,490 in Shasta lake.
- A higher percentage of married families is found in Shasta lake at 35.0% compared to 29.0% in New bedford.
- The poverty level is higher in New bedford at 15%, compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- New bedford has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 5.1% in Shasta lake.
Demographics
Demographics Shasta lake vs New bedford provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.
Demographic | Shasta lake | New bedford |
---|---|---|
Black | Data is updating | 5 |
White | 74 | 56 |
Asian | 1 | 1 |
Hispanic | 12 | 23 |
Two or More Races | 11 | 14 |
American Indian | 2 | 1 |
Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs New bedford
- In New bedford, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 5% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
- Shasta lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 56% in New bedford.
- Both Shasta lake and New bedford have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
- New bedford has a higher percentage of Hispanic residents at 23%, compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
- The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in New bedford at 14%, compared to 11% in Shasta lake.
- A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 1% in New bedford.
Health Statistics
The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.
Health Metric | Shasta lake | New bedford |
---|---|---|
Mental Health Not Good | 19.3% | 19.4% |
Physical Health Not Good | 13.2% | 13.4% |
Depression | 22.9% | 24.2% |
Smoking | 17.4% | 22.3% |
Binge Drinking | 17.5% | 16.4% |
Obesity | 32.5% | 33.6% |
Disability Percentage | 25.0% | 14.0% |
Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs New bedford
- In New bedford, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 19.4% compared to 19.3% in Shasta lake.
- Higher depression rates are seen in New bedford at 24.2% versus 22.9% in Shasta lake.
- New bedford has a higher smoking rate at 22.3% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
- Binge drinking is more common in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 16.4% in New bedford.
- New bedford has higher obesity rates at 33.6% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
- Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 14.0% in New bedford.
Education Levels
The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.
Education Level | Shasta lake | New bedford |
---|---|---|
No Schooling | 0.6% (67) | 2.7% (2,746) |
High School Diploma | 17.0% (1,759) | 19.3% (19,436) |
Less than High School | 11.4% (1,176) | 28.8% (29,037) |
Bachelor's Degree and Higher | 9.2% (946) | 10.9% (11,005) |
Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs New bedford
- In New bedford, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 2.7% compared to 0.6% in Shasta lake.
- In New bedford, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 19.3% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
- The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in New bedford at 28.8%, compared to 11.4% in Shasta lake.
- In New bedford, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.9% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.
Crime and Safety
Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.