Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Mendenhall, MS

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Mendenhall, MS.

Data Shasta lake Mendenhall
Population 10,335 2,148
Median Age 38.8 years 39.0 years
Median Income $54,490 $35,956
Married Families 35.0% 31.0%
Poverty Level 12% 20%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 5.5

Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mendenhall

  • In Shasta lake, the population is higher at 10,335, compared to 2,148 in Mendenhall.
  • The median age in Mendenhall is higher at 39.0 years, compared to 38.8 years in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher median income of $54,490 compared to $35,956 in Mendenhall.
  • A higher percentage of married families is found in Shasta lake at 35.0% compared to 31.0% in Mendenhall.
  • The poverty level is higher in Mendenhall at 20%, compared to 12% in Shasta lake.
  • Mendenhall has a higher unemployment rate at 5.5% compared to 5.1% in Shasta lake.

Demographics

Demographics Shasta lake vs Mendenhall provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shasta lake Mendenhall
Black Data is updating 65
White 74 34
Asian 1 Data is updating
Hispanic 12 Data is updating
Two or More Races 11 1
American Indian 2 Data is updating

Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 65% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 34% in Mendenhall.
  • The Asian population is larger in Shasta lake at 1% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Shasta lake at 12% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.
  • More residents identify as two or more races in Shasta lake at 11% compared to 1% in Mendenhall.
  • A greater percentage of American Indian residents live in Shasta lake at 2% compared to 0% in Mendenhall.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shasta lake Mendenhall
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 19.1%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 14.6%
Depression 22.9% 24.8%
Smoking 17.4% 24.5%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 13.7%
Obesity 32.5% 46.3%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 30.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mendenhall

  • More residents in Shasta lake report poor mental health at 19.3% compared to 19.1% in Mendenhall.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mendenhall at 24.8% versus 22.9% in Shasta lake.
  • Mendenhall has a higher smoking rate at 24.5% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 13.7% in Mendenhall.
  • Mendenhall has higher obesity rates at 46.3% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
  • There is a higher percentage of disabled individuals in Mendenhall at 30.0% compared to 25.0% in Shasta lake.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shasta lake Mendenhall
No Schooling 0.6% (67) 0.7% (16)
High School Diploma 17.0% (1,759) 17.9% (385)
Less than High School 11.4% (1,176) 20.7% (445)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (946) 18.4% (395)

Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mendenhall

  • In Mendenhall, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Shasta lake.
  • In Mendenhall, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 17.9% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mendenhall at 20.7%, compared to 11.4% in Shasta lake.
  • In Mendenhall, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 18.4% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.