Demographics details for Shasta lake, CA vs Mccurtain, OK

Population Overview

Compare main population characteristics in Shasta lake, CA vs Mccurtain, OK.

Data Shasta lake Mccurtain
Population 10,335 30,931
Median Age 38.8 years 38.2 years
Median Income $54,490 $47,046
Married Families 35.0% 37.0%
Poverty Level 12% 12%
Unemployment Rate 5.1 4.6

Population Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mccurtain

  • The population in Mccurtain is higher at 30,931, compared to 10,335 in Shasta lake.
  • Residents in Shasta lake have a higher median age of 38.8 years compared to 38.2 years in Mccurtain.
  • Shasta lake has a higher median income of $54,490 compared to $47,046 in Mccurtain.
  • In Mccurtain, the percentage of married families is higher at 37.0%, compared to 35.0% in Shasta lake.
  • The poverty level is identical in both Shasta lake and Mccurtain at 12%.
  • The unemployment rate in Shasta lake is higher at 5.1%, compared to 4.6% in Mccurtain.

Demographics

Demographics Shasta lake vs Mccurtain provide insight into the diversity of the communities to compare.

Demographic Shasta lake Mccurtain
Black Data is updating 8
White 74 58
Asian 1 1
Hispanic 12 7
Two or More Races 11 12
American Indian 2 14

Demographics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mccurtain

  • In Mccurtain, the percentage of Black residents is higher at 8% compared to 0% in Shasta lake.
  • Shasta lake has a higher percentage of White residents at 74% compared to 58% in Mccurtain.
  • Both Shasta lake and Mccurtain have the same percentage of Asian residents at 1%.
  • The Hispanic community is larger in Shasta lake at 12% compared to 7% in Mccurtain.
  • The percentage of residents identifying as two or more races is higher in Mccurtain at 12%, compared to 11% in Shasta lake.
  • In Mccurtain, the percentage of American Indian residents is higher at 14%, compared to 2% in Shasta lake.

Health Statistics

The health statistics provide insights into prevalent health conditions in two communities.

Health Metric Shasta lake Mccurtain
Mental Health Not Good 19.3% 20.9%
Physical Health Not Good 13.2% 15.2%
Depression 22.9% 26.9%
Smoking 17.4% 25.0%
Binge Drinking 17.5% 13.7%
Obesity 32.5% 46.9%
Disability Percentage 25.0% 21.0%

Health Statistics Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mccurtain

  • In Mccurtain, a higher percentage report poor mental health at 20.9% compared to 19.3% in Shasta lake.
  • Higher depression rates are seen in Mccurtain at 26.9% versus 22.9% in Shasta lake.
  • Mccurtain has a higher smoking rate at 25.0% compared to 17.4% in Shasta lake.
  • Binge drinking is more common in Shasta lake at 17.5% compared to 13.7% in Mccurtain.
  • Mccurtain has higher obesity rates at 46.9% compared to 32.5% in Shasta lake.
  • Disability percentages are higher in Shasta lake at 25.0% compared to 21.0% in Mccurtain.

Education Levels

The educational attainment in the area helps gauge the workforce's skill level and economic potential.

Education Level Shasta lake Mccurtain
No Schooling 0.6% (67) 0.7% (209)
High School Diploma 17.0% (1,759) 23.5% (7,268)
Less than High School 11.4% (1,176) 17.2% (5,334)
Bachelor's Degree and Higher 9.2% (946) 10.3% (3,200)

Education Levels Comparison: Shasta lake vs Mccurtain

  • In Mccurtain, a larger percentage of residents lack formal schooling at 0.7% compared to 0.6% in Shasta lake.
  • In Mccurtain, the rate of residents with high school diplomas is higher at 23.5% compared to 17.0% in Shasta lake.
  • The percentage of residents with less than a high school education is higher in Mccurtain at 17.2%, compared to 11.4% in Shasta lake.
  • In Mccurtain, a larger share of residents have a bachelor's degree or higher at 10.3% compared to 9.2% in Shasta lake.

Crime and Safety

Understanding crime rates and safety measures is crucial for assessing the livability of a city or town. Crime levels can vary significantly from one neighborhood to another, influenced by various factors such as population density and local amenities. For instance, areas with high foot traffic, like train stations, might experience different crime dynamics compared to quieter residential neighborhoods. Evaluating these patterns helps in making informed decisions about safety and community well-being.